16 U.S.C. § 4

ADMINISTRATION OF THE INSTITUTE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)Management.—The Institute shall be jointly administered by the National Park Service and a public or private agency, organization, or institution, as determined by the Secretary.“(b)Guidelines.—The Institute shall be operated and managed in accordance with the study prepared by the National Park Service pursuant to section 203 of the Act entitled ‘An Act to conduct certain studies in the State of New Mexico’, approved November 15, 1990 (Public Law 101–578; 16 U.S.C. 4310 note).“(c)Contracts and Cooperative Agreements.—The Secretary may enter into a contract or cooperative agreement with a public or private agency, organization, or institution to carry out this Act.“(d)Facility.—“(1)Leasing or acquiring a facility.—The Secretary may lease or acquire a facility for the Institute.“(2)Construction of a facility.—If the Secretary determines that a suitable facility is not available for a lease or acquisition under paragraph (1), the Secretary may construct a facility for the Institute.“(e)Acceptance of Grants and Transfers.—To carry out this Act, the Secretary may accept—“(1) a grant or donation from a private person; or“(2) a transfer of funds from another Federal agency.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1982–2006 · leading case: Earth Island Inst. v. United States Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Earth Island Inst. v. United States Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2006). · cites it 2× “The FWS is currently engaged in a 12-month review of the California spotted owl as required by 16 U.S.C. § 4 (b)(3)(B). Id. Among the factors prompting the 12 month review was the 2004 Sup- plement, as well as new evidence concerning the effects of fires on the owls.”

Proposed Coop. Agreement for the Admin. of the San Antonio Missions Nat'l Historical Park (OLC 1982). “"S ee 16U.S C § 4 1Oee(b) and (d). The secular purpose of the legislation is confirmed by its legislative history.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.