16 U.S.C. § 410cc

Congressional statement of findings and purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Congress finds that—(1) certain sites and structures in Lowell, Massachusetts, historically and culturally the most significant planned industrial city in the United States, symbolize in physical form the Industrial Revolution;(2) the cultural heritage of many of the ethnic groups that immigrated to the United States during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is still preserved in Lowell’s neighborhoods;(3) a very large proportion of the buildings, other structures, and districts in Lowell date to the period of the Industrial Revolution and are nationally significant historical resources, including the five-and-six-tenths-mile power canal system, seven original mill complexes, and significant examples of early housing, commercial structures, transportation facilities, and buildings associated with labor and social institutions; and(4) despite the expenditure of substantial amounts of money by the city of Lowell and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for historical and cultural preservation and interpretation in Lowell, the early buildings and other structures in Lowell may be lost without the assistance of the Federal Government.(b) It is the purpose of this subchapter to preserve and interpret the nationally significant historical and cultural sites, structures, and districts in Lowell, Massachusetts, for the benefit and inspiration of present and future generations by implementing to the extent practicable the recommendations in the report of the Lowell Historic Canal District Commission.(Pub. L. 95–290, § 1, June 5, 1978, 92 Stat. 290.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort Title of 2012 Amendment

Pub. L. 112–182, § 1, Oct. 5, 2012, 126 Stat. 1420, provided that: “This Act [amending section 410cc–22 of this title] may be cited as the ‘Lowell National Historical Park Land Exchange Act of 2012’.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: United States Dep't of the Interior v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 876 F.3d 360 (1st Cir. 2015).
United States Dep't of the Interior v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 876 F.3d 360 (1st Cir. 2015). · cites it 3× “290 (1978) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 410cc to 410cc-37 (1978)), which recognized that “certain sites and structures in Lowell, Massachusetts, historically and culturally the most significant planned industrial city in the United States, symbolize in physical form the Industrial…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 410cc(a)(3) — 1 case
United States Dep't of the Interior v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 876 F.3d 360 (1st Cir. 2015). “290 (1978) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 410cc to 410cc-37 (1978)), which recognized that “certain sites and structures in Lowell, Massachusetts, historically and culturally the most significant planned industrial city in the United States, symbolize in physical form the Industrial…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 410cc(a)(l) — 1 case
United States Dep't of the Interior v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 876 F.3d 360 (1st Cir. 2015). “290 (1978) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 410cc to 410cc-37 (1978)), which recognized that “certain sites and structures in Lowell, Massachusetts, historically and culturally the most significant planned industrial city in the United States, symbolize in physical form the Industrial…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.