16 U.S.C. § 4201
Statement of purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to perpetuate healthy populations of African elephants.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1997–2012 · leading case: United States v. David Grigsby, Doris Grigsby, 111 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1997).
United States v. David Grigsby, Doris Grigsby, 111 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1997). “The legislative history, congressional findings, and section 4222(e) evidence that lawful, sport-hunted trophies do not deplete African elephants sufficiently to be protected under the AECA and that preservation of elephants for sport hunters actually protects African elephants…”
United States v. One Etched Ivory Tusk of African Elephant, 871 F. Supp. 2d 128 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “, and the African Elephant Conservation Act (the “AECA”), 16 U.S.C. § 4201 et seq. (Compl. ¶ 2.) Counts One and Two of the Complaint allege that Claimant imported Defendant Tusk into the United States without a permit for the export (Count One) or the import (Count Two) of a…”
United States v. Grigsby (11th Cir. 1997). “The legislative history, congressional findings, and section 4222(e) evidence that lawful, sport-hunted trophies do not deplete African elephants sufficiently to be protected under the AECA and that preservation of elephants for sport hunters actually protects African elephants…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.