U.S. Code
»
Title 16
» Chapter CHAPTER 1— NATIONAL PARKS, MILITARY PARKS, MONUMENTS, AND SEASHORES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER CXXXIV— RED CLIFFS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case:
Doyle v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
Doyle v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“The district court granted the motion on May 27, 2015, and ordered the federal defendants to develop a comprehensive plan for the long-term management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area as required by 16 U.S.C. § 460www(d)(1) on or before June 30, 2016.”
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
· cites it 13× “First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(a)(1): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(a)(2): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(d)(1): 1 case
Doyle v. United States, 129 Fed. Cl. 147 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“The district court granted the motion on May 27, 2015, and ordered the federal defendants to develop a comprehensive plan for the long-term management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area as required by 16 U.S.C. § 460www(d)(1) on or before June 30, 2016.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(e)(1): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(e)(1)(A): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(e)(2): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
16 U.S.C. § 460www(e)(4): 1 case
Conserve Sw. Utah v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, No. 2026-0317 (D.D.C. Mar. 1, 2026).
“First, they argue that the Bureau’s approval of the Northern Corridor ROW violates the Omnibus Public Land Management Act (“OPLMA” or “Act”), 16 U.S.C. § 460www, which is the statute governing the Department’s management of the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.