16 U.S.C. § 469
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: Romero v. Universal City TX, 256 F.3d 349 (5th Cir. 2001).
Romero v. Universal City TX, 256 F.3d 349 (5th Cir. 2001). “§§ 470 -470mm; the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974, 16 U.S.C. §§ 469 -469c; the Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, 16 U.”
Cheavens v. Pub. Serv. Corp., 176 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (D. Colo. 2016). “the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act 2 (“AHPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 469 , and the DM. Plaintiff brings claims against the Forest Service Defendants under the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.”
Charles C. Allison v. Robert C. Froehlke, Sec'y of the Army, 470 F.2d 1123 (5th Cir. 1972). “§ 540 ; the Historical and Archeological Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 469 et seq.; the Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966, 33 U.”
Newburyport Redevelopment Auth. v. Commonwealth, 401 N.E.2d 118 (Mass. App. Ct. 1980). “of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts) were maps or reports depicting or discussing the results of archaeological investigations of various areas within the locus and the impact of the authority’s urban renewal project upon properties included on…”
Colorado Gen. Assembly v. Lamm, 738 P.2d 1156 (Colo. 1987). “(1976); Historical and Archeological Data Preservation Act of 1960, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § 469 , et seq. (Supp. IV, 1974); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.”
Quechan Indian Tribe v. United States, 535 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (S.D. Cal. 2008). “§ 433 , which protects historic ruins and objects of antiquity on lands owned or controlled- by the government; and the Archaeological Historic and Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 469 — 469c-l, which provides for the preservation of historical and archeological data for…”
Defenders of Wildlife v. Chertoff, 527 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2007). “; the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 469 ef seq.; the Antiquities Act, 16 U.”
Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate v. United States Dep't of State, 659 F. Supp. 2d 1071 (D.S.D. 2009). “§ 1996 , the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act ("AHPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 469 et. seq., the Archaeological Resources Protection Act ("ARPA”), 16 U.”
Attakai v. United States, 746 F. Supp. 1395 (D. Ariz. 1990). “Historical and Archaeological Data Preservation Act (HADPA) Since the NHPA as originally enacted only provides preconstruction protection of historical and archaeological sites, in 1974 Congress amended HADPA, 16 U.S.C. § 469 et seq., to provide protection to significant…”
Warm Springs Dam Task Force v. Gribble, 378 F. Supp. 240 (N.D. Cal. 1974). “At the time it was commenced and pursuant to the Reservoir Salvage Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 469 and 469a (1960) the Corps notified the Secretary of Interior who was required by the act to: “.”
Carson v. Alvord, 487 F. Supp. 1049 (N.D. Ga. 1980). “, or the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 469 et seq. It is that question which is now before the court.”
Starkey v. United States Dep't of Interior, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (S.D. Cal. 2002). “equires a permit or other permission under this chapter or under any other provision of Federal law may not be made available to the public under sub-chapter II of chapter 5 of Title 5 [FOIA] or under any other provision of law unless the Federal land manager concerned…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.