16 U.S.C. § 5405
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2003–2005 · leading case: Basel Action Network v. Mar. Admin., 370 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2005).
Basel Action Network v. Mar. Admin., 370 F. Supp. 2d 57 (D.D.C. 2005). “elics of the 1940s) and condition, the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2001 set a September 30, 2006 deadline for MARAD to dispose of all obsolete vessels “in a manner that provides the best value to the Government, except in any case in which obtaining the…”
Basel Action Network v. Mar. Admin., 285 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2003). “]” 16 U.S.C. § 5405 (c). Plaintiffs’ first cause of action in their complaint alleges, in relevant part, that Defendants have arbitrarily and capriciously ignored the requirements of the NMHA in violation of the APA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.