16 U.S.C. § 577g

Payment for additional lands acquired in northern Minnesota

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of the Treasury, upon the certification of the Secretary of Agriculture, shall pay to the State of Minnesota, at the close of each fiscal year from any national-forest receipts not otherwise appropriated a sum of money equivalent to three-quarters of 1 per centum of the fair appraised value of such national-forest lands as may be situated within the area described in section 577d of this title at the end of each fiscal year; and the payments made hereunder shall be distributed to each of the three aforesaid counties in conformity with the fair appraised value of such national-forest lands in each county: Provided, That the fair appraised value of the lands shall be determined by the Secretary of Agriculture at ten-year intervals and his determination shall be conclusive and final: Provided further, That the first payment to the State of Minnesota under the provisions of this section shall not be due until the close of the first full fiscal year after June 22, 1948: And provided further, That the provisions of section 500 of this title, shall not be applicable to the national-forest lands to which this section applies.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1977–2015 · leading case: Organized Vill. of Kake v. United States Dep't of Agric., 795 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2015).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Organized Vill. of Kake v. United States Dep't of Agric., 795 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “§§ 6901–6907 (Payments in Lieu of Taxes); 16 U.S.C. §§ 577g, 577g-1 (Payments to Minnesota); 43 U.”

Julius Goldman's Egg City v. United States, 214 Ct. Cl. 345 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “§§ 217a, 610e, 1385, 1785; 16 U.S.C. §§ 577g, 677g-1. In general, explicit statutory provisions seeming to preclude judicial review are not common and even when they are used the courts have in many instances found some sort of review appropriate.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.