16 U.S.C. § 5956

Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2001–2013 · leading case: Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United States, 114 Fed. Cl. 6 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
Eco Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United States, 114 Fed. Cl. 6 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 2× “” 16 U.S.C. § 5956 ; see also AR Tab 4 at 24, 41, 55, 64 (prospectus stating that concessioners will be charged a “franchise fee” equal to at least three percent of the concessioner’s gross receipts or a flat fee of $500, whichever is greater).”
Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 142 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 4× “” 16 U.S.C. § 5956 (a). Thus, by statute, the NPS is required to determine the capital investment that a new conces-sioner will likely make if awarded the contract.”
Amfac Resorts, LLC v. Us Dept. of Interior, 142 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 4× “" 16 U.S.C. § 5956 (a). Thus, by statute, the NPS is required to determine the capital investment that a new concessioner will likely make if awarded the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.