16 U.S.C. § 645
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1872–1895 · leading case: United States v. Seveloff, 27 F. Cas. 1021 (D. Or. 1872).
United States v. Seveloff, 27 F. Cas. 1021 (D. Or. 1872). “The jurisdiction of this court over offenses committed in Alaska is conferred by section seven of the act of July 27, 1868 (see 16 U.S.C.A. § 645 note), and by such section confined to violations of that act and of the laws “relating to customs, commerce and navigation,” thereby…”
United States v. Carr, 25 F. Cas. 303 (D. Or. 1875). “§ 1957 [ 16 U.S.C.A. § 645 note]). *75 The demurrers are overruled, but the defendant may be heard upon the same questions in arrest of judgment if a verdict should be given against him on the trial.”
In re Moore, 66 F. 947 (D. Alaska 1895). “§ 645 note), provides: “Until otherwise provided by law all violations of this chapter, and of the laws hereby extended to the territory of Aláska and the waters thereof, committed within the limits of the same shall be prosecuted in any district court of the United States in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.