16 U.S.C. § 668d

Availability of appropriations for Migratory Bird Treaty Act

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar

Moneys now or hereafter available to the Secretary of the Interior for the administration and enforcement of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of July 3, 1918 [16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.], shall be equally available for the administration and enforcement of this subchapter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1952–2021 · leading case: United States v. 65 Slot Machines, 102 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. La. 1952).
United States v. 65 Slot Machines, 102 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. La. 1952). “§§ 1761 , 1762, excluding prison-made goods from interstate commerce; the Lacey Act of 1900, 16 U.S.C.A. § 668d, prohibiting shipment of birds or other game taken in violation of state laws; and see, also, the Connolly “Hot Oil” Act, 15 U.”
Defenders of Wildlife v. US Fish & Wildlife Serv. (D.S.C. 2021). “97 ; and (3) failing to ensure that its management of Cape Romain will provide for the conservation of wildlife and will not undermine the Refuge’s purposes, see 16 U.S.C. § 668d(a)(4)(A) and (D). Plaintiff also contends that the Service has failed to comply with the substantive…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 668d(a)(4)(A) — 1 case
Defenders of Wildlife v. US Fish & Wildlife Serv. (D.S.C. 2021). “97 ; and (3) failing to ensure that its management of Cape Romain will provide for the conservation of wildlife and will not undermine the Refuge’s purposes, see 16 U.S.C. § 668d(a)(4)(A) and (D). Plaintiff also contends that the Service has failed to comply with the substantive…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.