16 U.S.C. § 688
Repealed. Pub. L. 95–625, title III, § 314(g), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3483
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1970–2005 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972).
Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972). “821 , 16 U. S. C. § 688 . [2] As analyzed by the District Court, the complaint alleged violations of law falling into four categories.”
Friends of Blackwater v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 391 F. Supp. 2d 115 (D.D.C. 2005). “(2000), the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (“BGEPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 688 (2000), and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (“ESA”), 16 U.”
United States v. Fmc Corp., 572 F.2d 902 (2d Cir. 1978). “Appellant claims support from the amendment of the Bald Eagle Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 688 , which added to the previous statute [in form similar to § 703] the words “knowingly, or with wanton disregard for the consequences of his act” and increased the penalties drastically,…”
Sierra Club v. Hickel, 433 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1970). “…is 1,178,767 acres, which does not include areas within Sequoia National Park or King’s Canyon National Park. . 16 U.S.C. § 688 .”
Balelo v. Baldrige, 724 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1984). “2d 210 (1979) (Court upheld regulation noting that Congress twice reviewed and amended the Act without rejecting the Department’s view that it was authorized under the Eagle Protection Act, 16 U.S.C. § 688 , to bar sale of preexisting artifacts); NLRB v.”
United States v. Timothy Patrick Kornwolf, 276 F.3d 1014 (8th Cir. 2002). “" 16 U.S.C. § 688 (a). 4 ."The import, export, purchase, sale, trade, or barter of bald and golden eagles, or their parts, nests, or eggs is prohibited.”
United States v. Wilgus (10th Cir. 2001). “872 (1990), this Court upholds Defendant’s criminal conviction under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), 16 U.S.C. § 688 (a), because, according to the Court, the BGEPA is a neutral, generally applicable law that comports with First Amendment demands.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.