16 U.S.C. § 715
Short title
This subchapter shall be known by the short title of “Migratory Bird Conservation Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1933–2025 · leading case: North Dakota v. United States, 460 U.S. 300 (1983).
North Dakota v. United States, 460 U.S. 300 (1983). “257, 16 U. S. C. § 715 et seq., became law. By § 5 of that Act, 45 Stat.”
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States, 862 F.3d 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2017). “1222 , 16 U.S.C. §§ 715 -715s. Id. at 595 , 93 S.”
Andrus v. Sierra Club, 442 U.S. 347 (1979). “1222 , as amended, 16 U. S. C. § 715 et seq.; and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 87 Stat.”
Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States, 90 Fed. Cl. 51 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “1222 , 16 U.S.C. § 715 , et seq., as part of the Lacassine Wildlife Refuge.”
United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co., 412 U.S. 580 (1973). “1222 , 16 U. S. C. § 715 et seq., as part of the Lacassine Wildlife Refuge.”
Stand up for California v. State of Cal., 6 Cal. App. 5th 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016). “83 Acres, the question was whether the governor of the State of Washington had authority to designate the state’s game commission as the agency responsible for approving federal land acquisitions for purposes of establishing migratory bird refuges pursuant to a federal statute,…”
Hoffman Homes, Inc., Formerly Known as Hoffman Grp. v. Adm'r, United States Env't Prot. Agency, 999 F.2d 256 (7th Cir. 1993). “, and in 1929 it passed the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 715 et seq.”
United States v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 801 F.3d 477 (5th Cir. 2015). “A contemporary statute, the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 715 , similarly intimates that "kill” may have little independent force, as it lists "kill” as part of the definition of "take.”
Waterfowl Ltd. Liab. Co. v. United States, 473 F.3d 135 (5th Cir. 2006). “In 1937, acting under the authority of the Migratory Bird Conservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 715 et seq., the United States purchased approximately 13,000 acres of land in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, from plaintiff Lacassane Co.”
Cent. Pines Land Co. v. United States, 274 F.3d 881 (5th Cir. 2001). “16 U.S.C. § 715 et seq. 21 . Little Lake, 412 U.”
Hoffman Homes, Inc., Formerly Known as Hoffman Grp. v. Adm'r, United States Env't Prot. Agency, 961 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir. 1992). “(The Migratory Waterfowl and Other Wildlife Refuge in California Act); 16 U.S.C. § 715 et seq. (The Migratory Bird Conservation Act).”
United States v. State of North Dakota, 650 F.2d 911 (8th Cir. 1981). “In 1929, the Migratory Bird Conservation Act (Conservation Act) 16 U.S.C. § 715 et seq. was enacted. Complementing the Treaty Act, 3 it authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land for inviolate migratory bird sanctuaries but conditions that acquisition on the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.