16 U.S.C. § 742j
Authorization of appropriations
There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1977–2001 · leading case: Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (1981).
Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc., 452 U.S. 264 (1981). “2d 784 (CA9 1979) (upholding the Airborne Hunting Act, 16 U. S. C. § 742j — 1); Friends of the Earth, Inc.”
Hoffman Homes, Inc., Formerly Known as Hoffman Grp. v. Adm'r, United States Env't Prot. Agency, 961 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir. 1992). “” The court held that the federal statute was a proper exercise of the Commerce Clause power because Congress was “acting to promote safety in an artery of commerce.”
United States v. Sheldon C. G. Helsley, Orville B. Jones & Jerry A. Shipman, Defendants, 615 F.2d 784 (9th Cir. 1979). “480 (codified at 16 U.S.C. § 742j — 1 (1976)). The appellees were charged with shooting a coyote from an aircraft in violation of the Act.”
Am. Horse Prot. Ass'n v. United States Dep't of Interior, 551 F.2d 432 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “480 , 16 U.S.C. § 742j—1 (Supp. V 1975); the Act of Sept.”
United States v. Red Frame Parasail, 160 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (D. Ariz. 2001). “STATUTORY FRAMEWORK Subsection (a) of 16 U.S.C. § 742j — 1, the Arborne Hunting Act (“AHA”), sets penalties for any person who: 1.”
United States v. Bair, 488 F. Supp. 22 (D. Neb. 1979). “The defendants have been charged with violations of 16 U.S.C. § 742j — 1 and the aiding and abetting provision, 18 U.”
United States v. One Hughes Helicopter, 595 F. Supp. 131 (N.D. Tex. 1984). “16 U.S.C. § 742j — 1(e) makes aircraft and equipment used in violation of the Airborne Hunting Act subject to forfeiture.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.