18 U.S.C. § 114
Maiming within maritime and territorial jurisdiction
Whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and with intent to torture (as defined in section 2340), maim, or disfigure, cuts, bites, or slits the nose, ear, or lip, or cuts out or disables the tongue, or puts out or destroys an eye, or cuts off or disables a limb or any member of another person; or
Whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, and with like intent, throws or pours upon another person, any scalding water, corrosive acid, or caustic substance—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2025 · leading case: United States v. Jose B. Salamanca, United States of Am. v. Hector A. Salamanca, 990 F.2d 629 (D.C. Cir. 1993).
United States v. Jose B. Salamanca, United States of Am. v. Hector A. Salamanca, 990 F.2d 629 (D.C. Cir. 1993). “While the evidence is unclear as to exactly how many, he struck enough forceful blows to split open Culver’s skull, shatter his eye socket, knock out three of his teeth, and break his jaw.”
United States v. Bin Laden, 92 F. Supp. 2d 189 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “§ 924 (c);] and 18 U.S.C. § 114 .” Odeh’s Memo, at 7. Whether Congress intended several of these provisions (viz.”
United States v. Sharpnack, 355 U.S. 286 (1958). “§ 113 ; maiming, 18 U. S. C. § 114 ; larceny, 18 U. S. C. § 661 ; receiving stolen property, 18 U.”
Roum v. Bush, 461 F. Supp. 2d 40 (D.D.C. 2006). “§ 2332b, 18 U.S.C. § 114 , 18 U.S.C. § 956 , 18 U.”
United States v. Awan, 459 F. Supp. 2d 167 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “§ 1111 (a) (murder) 24 and 18 U.S.C. § 114 *182 (maiming) 25 and include specific scienter requirements.”
United States v. Paul H. \Bud\" Holmes", 822 F.2d 481 (5th Cir. 1987). “Thus, for example, under the government’s theory, for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 114 , a $25,000 fine could be imposed under section 114 and, in addition, a fine of $250,000 could also be imposed under section 3623(a)(3).”
United States v. Denetclaw, 96 F.3d 454 (10th Cir. 1996). “§§ 113 (f) and 1153; and maiming, 18 U.S.C. §§ 114 and 1153, and sentenced to sixty-three months imprisonment.”
State v. Donald, 775 So. 2d 1054 (La. 2000). “At the federal level, for example, 18 U.S.C. § 114 provides that "[i]n all cases where a seal is necessary by law to any commission, process, or other instrument provided for by the laws of Congress, it shall be lawful to affix the proper seal by making an impression therewith…”
United States v. Markiewicz, 978 F.3d 786 (2d Cir. 1992). “§ 113 ; maiming, see 18 U.S.C. § 114 ; theft, see 18 U.S.C. § 661 ; receiving stolen property, see 18 U.”
Fraser v. Astra S.S. Corp., 18 F.R.D. 240 (S.D.N.Y. 1955). “18 U.S.C. § 114 . Maiming within maritime and territorial jurisdiction.”
United States v. Frank Alfred Analla, Jr., 490 F.2d 1204 (10th Cir. 1974). “Addressing ourselves first to the requested instructions on “assault resulting in serious bodily injury,” we find that such instructions attempted to define the crime in terms of 18 U.S.C. § 114 . Section 1153, however, provides that “assault resulting in serious bodily injury”…”
United States v. One Big Six Wheel, 987 F. Supp. 169 (E.D.N.Y 1997). “§ 1201 (a)(2)), maiming ( 18 U.S.C. § 114 ), and receiving stolen property ( 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.