18 U.S.C. § 1622
Subornation of perjury
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 137
cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1956–2026 · leading case: Patricia Flores v. Attorney Gen. United States, 856 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2017).
Patricia Flores v. Attorney Gen. United States, 856 F.3d 280 (3rd Cir. 2017). “38 If Congress considered § 3 an obstruction-of-justice Chapter 79, “Perjury”); 18 U.S.C.§ 1622 (criminalizing subornation of perjury in Chapter 79, “Perjury”).”
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton, Nat'l Ass'n of Crim. Def. Lawyers, Amicus Curiae, 165 F.3d 1297 (10th Cir. 1999). “Moreover, a prosecutor who procures false testimony is surely subject to penalty under 18 U.S.C. § 1622 . The dissent's observation that both statutes employ the word "whoever” misses our point.”
United States v. Richard Cravero, 530 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1976). “Defendant was tried before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for one count each of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622 , 1 subornation of perjury, 18 U.”
United States v. Slawik, 408 F. Supp. 190 (D. Del. 1976). “§ 1510 (“Obstruction of Criminal Investigation”); 4 18 U.S.C § 1622 (“Subornation of Perjury”); 5 18 U.”
United States v. Thomas A. Larkin, 605 F.2d 1360 (5th Cir. 1979). “§ 1503 , 4 to suborn perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1622 , 5 to embezzle funds of a labor organization in violation of *1363 29 U.”
United States v. Fred T. MacKey, 571 F.2d 376 (7th Cir. 1978). “2 Count III charged the defendant with subornation of perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622 . 3 Counts IV and V of the indictment related only to F.”
Zaher Zahrey v. Martin E. Coffey, 221 F.3d 342 (2d Cir. 2000). “, 18 U.S.C. § 1622 (subornation of perjury), or disciplinary sanctions, see N.”
United States v. Whiting, 522 F.3d 845 (8th Cir. 2008). “See 18 U.S.C. § 1622 . Before imposing an enhancement under § 3C1.”
United States v. Raphael Bernard Bradberry, 466 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2006). “” 18 U.S.C.A. § 1622 ; see also Dunnigan, 507 U.”
United States v. Joseph Michael Lincoln, A/K/A Mohammed Ali Ballagh Omer, 956 F.2d 1465 (8th Cir. 1992). “Joseph Lincoln appeals the sentence he received after pleading guilty to suborning perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1622 (1988). Lincoln presents three issues for our review.”
United States v. Jose Ceballos-Amaya, 470 F. App'x 254 (5th Cir. 2012). “” 18 U.S.C. § 1622 . Credibility determinations are within the province of the district court.”
Hernandez v. United States, 96 Fed. Cl. 195 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “§ 1621 (2006) (perjury); and 18 U.S.C. § 1622 (2006) (subornation of perjury).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.