18 U.S.C. § 1901
Collecting or disbursing officer trading in public property
Whoever, being an officer of the United States concerned in the collection or the disbursement of the revenues thereof, carries on any trade or business in the funds or debts of the United States, or of any State, or in any public property of either, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and shall be removed from office, and be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: Abagninin v. Amvac Chem. Corp., 545 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2008).
Abagninin v. Amvac Chem. Corp., 545 F.3d 733 (9th Cir. 2008). “18 U.S.C. § 1901 (a). The Second Circuit has recognized that dismissal of a genocide claim is appropriate when the complaint fails to allege facts sufficient to show specific intent.”
Mehinovic v. Vuckovic, 198 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (N.D. Ga. 2002). “3d at 241 ; see also The Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987, 18 U.S.C. § 1901 (1988), which criminalizes genocide and makes it actionable under domestic U.”
Kush v. Gates (D. Utah 2023). “a genocide/war/crime against all humanity.”16 Kush contends Defendants helped plan and “operate the event criminally” and asks the court to jail Defendants and liquidate their assets to “pay for the damages from the gene therapy technology they lied and called vaccines.”
Kush v. Dickson (D. Utah 2025). “Kush asserted that these Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1901 , stating that “COVID was a pharmaceutical-military-industrial complex operation” and the “Certificate of Vaccination Identification Psychological [and] Biological Operation was .”
Strege v. Launching Nuclear Missiles at Miami (S.D. Fla. 2025). “against all Defendants, violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1901 as well as: Genocide Laws, ICC, Alien Tort Claims Act 28 U.”
Abagninin v. Amvac Chem. Co (9th Cir. 2008). “However, the Implementation Act is in line with, rather than opposed to, the recognized principle of international law that requires specific intent for the crime of genocide.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.