18 U.S.C. § 1952B
Renumbered § 1959]
[renumbered]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, & Armando Velasquez, 11 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 1993).
United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, & Armando Velasquez, 11 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 1993). “II 1984) (18 U.S.C. § 1952B renumbered 18 U.S.C. § 1959 (1988) (collectively “§ 1959”) by Pub.”
United States v. Robert Salerno, 108 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 1997). “Robert Salerno was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1952B 1 for murder and conspiracy to commit murder for the purpose of maintaining or increasing his position in a racketeering enterprise.”
United States v. Hernandez, 604 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2010). “ Count 2Conspiracy to kidnap and assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of then-18 U.S.C. § 1952B, arising from the kidnaping and torture of Pedro Hernandez.”
United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, & Nelson Frias, 983 F.2d 369 (2d Cir. 1993). “§§ 841 (a)(1) and 846 (1988); and committing violent crimes for the purpose of maintaining or increasing their positions in a racketeering enterprise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952B (Supp. II 1984), renumbered 18 U.”
United States v. Raul Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 (9th Cir. 1992). “” Lopez-Alvarez was convicted on all charges brought against him: one count of violent crimes in aid of racketeering for the kidnapping and murder of Camarena (18 U.S.C. §§ 1952B, 2) (Count One), another count of the same crime for the kidnapping and murder of Zavala (Count…”
United States v. Javier Vasquez-Velasco, 15 F.3d 833 (9th Cir. 1994). “The defendant was charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1952B, the predecessor to § 1959.”
United States v. Orazio Stantini, Also Known as Ozzie, & Robert Bisaccia, 85 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 1996). “Background In April 1993, Stantini and Bisaccia were indicted and charged with conspiring to murder and murdering Francesco Oliveri in May 1988 for the purpose of maintaining or increasing their position in the Gambino organized crime family (the Gambino family) in violation of…”
Ferrara v. United States, 384 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D. Mass. 2005). “As described earlier, Count 3 charged that Ferrara conspired with Barone to murder Limoli for the purposes of gaining entrance to and maintaining and increasing positions in the Patriarca Family, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(b)(l) and (2). Count 4 charged Ferrara and Barone…”
United States v. Coonan, 938 F.2d 1553 (2d Cir. 1991). “Kelly was also convicted of attempted murder and assault for the purpose of maintaining and increasing his position in the racketeering enterprise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952B (Supp. V 1987) (subsequently renumbered as 18 U.”
United States v. Stanley McCall, 915 F.2d 811 (2d Cir. 1990). “The information to which McCall pleaded guilty charged him with committing and aiding and abetting violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952B(a)(3) and 2. Section J 952B has been renumbered as Section 1959, and we will refer to it as Section 1959…”
Concepcion v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 2d 206 (E.D.N.Y 2002). “Count 19: Committing an assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(3?)). Count 21/15th Racketeering Act— Kidnaping and assault in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.”
United States v. Mills, 378 F. Supp. 3d 563 (E.D. Mich. 2019). “These eight defendants include Mario Jackson, Michael Richardson, Corey Mills, Devontae Russell, Phillip Peaks, Patrick Johnson, Lomnil Jackson, and Donell Thompson.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a) — 1 case
Concepcion v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 2d 206 (E.D.N.Y 2002). “Count 19: Committing an assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(3?)). Count 21/15th Racketeering Act— Kidnaping and assault in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(3) — 1 case
United States v. Stanley McCall, 915 F.2d 811 (2d Cir. 1990). “The information to which McCall pleaded guilty charged him with committing and aiding and abetting violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1952B(a)(3) and 2. Section J 952B has been renumbered as Section 1959, and we will refer to it as Section 1959…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(5) — 2 cases
United States v. Orazio Stantini, Also Known as Ozzie, & Robert Bisaccia, 85 F.3d 9 (2d Cir. 1996). “Background In April 1993, Stantini and Bisaccia were indicted and charged with conspiring to murder and murdering Francesco Oliveri in May 1988 for the purpose of maintaining or increasing their position in the Gambino organized crime family (the Gambino family) in violation of…”
Stantini v. United States, 140 F.3d 424 (2d Cir. 1998).
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(l) — 6 cases
United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, & Armando Velasquez, 11 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 1993). “II 1984) (18 U.S.C. § 1952B renumbered 18 U.S.C. § 1959 (1988) (collectively “§ 1959”) by Pub.”
United States v. Burnside, 824 F. Supp. 1215 (N.D. Ill. 1993).
United States v. Bracy, 67 F.3d 1421 (9th Cir. 1995).
Concepcion v. United States, 181 F. Supp. 2d 206 (E.D.N.Y 2002). “Count 19: Committing an assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.S.C. § 1952B(a)(3?)). Count 21/15th Racketeering Act— Kidnaping and assault in aid of racketeering activity (18 U.”
United States v. Gotti, 753 F. Supp. 443 (E.D.N.Y 1990).
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(b)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Robert Salerno, 108 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 1997). “Robert Salerno was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1952B 1 for murder and conspiracy to commit murder for the purpose of maintaining or increasing his position in a racketeering enterprise.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(b)(l) — 1 case
Ferrara v. United States, 384 F. Supp. 2d 384 (D. Mass. 2005). “As described earlier, Count 3 charged that Ferrara conspired with Barone to murder Limoli for the purposes of gaining entrance to and maintaining and increasing positions in the Patriarca Family, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952B(b)(l) and (2). Count 4 charged Ferrara and Barone…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.