Notes of Decisions
Cited in
262
cases (
61 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case:
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
· cites it 20× “See 18 U.S.C. § 2331 et seq. Courts that have addressed claims brought under the statute providing a civil cause of action to American nationals injured by terrorist acts have referred to it generally as the “ATA.”
Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLC, 2 F.4th 871 (9th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 6× “GOOGLE “[I]nternational terrorism” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (1). Acts of international terrorism “involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if…”
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Org., 835 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2016).
· cites it 3× “” 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (1)(A). The acts must also appear to be intended “(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or…”
Kaplan v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, 999 F.3d 842 (2d Cir. 2021).
· cites it 3× “Daniels, Judge, dismissing, for 4 failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, plaintiffs' second amended 5 complaint (or "SAC") seeking (A) to hold defendant bank liable as a principal under 6 the Antiterrorism Act of 1990 ("ATA"), see 18 U.S.C. §§ 2331 (1),…”
Rhonda Kemper v. Deutsche Bank AG, 911 F.3d 383 (7th Cir. 2018).
· cites it 6× “18 U.S.C. § 2331 (1)(A). Kemper alleges that Deutsche Bank violated the federal criminal prohibitions on providing material support to terrorism and conspiring to provide material support.”
Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William Barr, 941 F.3d 358 (9th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 4× “A threat of committing an act of international terrorism (as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (1)) or an act of domestic terrorism (as defined in 18 U.”
United States v. Randy Graham, 275 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2001).
· cites it 4× ““International terrorism” is defined at 18 U.S.C. § 2331 . 4 3- As to the origin of the term “Federal crime of terrorism” which is found in 18 U.”
Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 882 F.3d 314 (2d Cir. 2018).
· cites it 3× “4 On this appeal, Arab Bank argues that it was wrongfully denied judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial because (1) the district court failed correctly to instruct the jury on the ATA's "act of international terrorism" element as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (1) ;…”
Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC, 993 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2021).
· cites it 5× “The "external 17 appearance" relevant to 18 U.S.C. § 2331 is not the "external 18 appearance" presented by a terrorist group or its funders.”
United States v. Salim, 287 F. Supp. 2d 250 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).
· cites it 9× “376 (2001), Congress created a definí-, tion for “domestic terrorism” at 18 U.S.C. § 2331 (5)(C) that prohibits terrorist activities that “occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” but did not amend U.”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 891 F. Supp. 2d 335 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
· cites it 20× “See 18 U.S.C. § 2331 et seq. Courts that have addressed claims brought under the statute providing a civil cause of action to American nationals injured by terrorist acts have referred to it generally as the “ATA.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2331(4) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)(A) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)(B)(i) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5)(B)(ii) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.