Notes of Decisions
Cited in
28
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case:
Almog v. Arab Bank, PLC, 471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y 2007).
Almog v. Arab Bank, PLC, 471 F. Supp. 2d 257 (E.D.N.Y 2007).
· cites it 6× “106-6 (1998), implemented in 18 U.S.C. § 2332f, Pub.L. No. 107-197, 116 Stat.”
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Org., 835 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2016).
“§ 1992 , detonating an explosive device on a public transportation system, 18 U.S.C. § 2332f, and conspiracy to commit those acts, 18 U.”
United States v. Tsarnaev, 968 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2020).
· cites it 2× “Conspiring to bomb a place of public use resulting in the deaths of Krystle Campbell, Sean Collier, Lingzi Lu, and Martin Richard, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. 7. Bombing a place of public use (Marathon Sports) resulting in the death of Krystle Campbell, in violation of 18…”
United States v. Hausa, 258 F. Supp. 3d 265 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
· cites it 9× “Government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. There is no merit to this argument either.”
United States v. Capers, 20 F.4th 105 (2d Cir. 2021).
“2020) (discussing provision punishing conspiracies to plant bombs in public places where “death results” with death or life in prison, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2332f(a), 2332a(a)); see also United States v.”
Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli, 534 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “§ 2332b (prohibiting acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries); 18 U.S.C. § 2332f (prohibiting the bombing of places of public use or government facilities); 18 U.”
United States v. Harun, 922 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2019).
“§ 2332 (b)(2) ; (2) conspiracy to bomb a government facility, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f ; (3) conspiracy to provide material support to al-Qaeda, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Tsarnaev, 157 F. Supp. 3d 57 (D. Mass. 2016).
“§ 2332a, bombing a place of public use in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f, malicious destruction of property by fire or explosive in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Defreitas, 718 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2013).
“On the same day, Defreitas, Kadir, Nur, and Ibrahim were charged by complaint with conspiracy to attack a public transportation system, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(2), (b)(1)(E), (b)(2)(A), and (c); conspiracy to destroy a building by fire or explosive, in violation of…”
United States v. Al Farekh, 956 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2020).
“government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f (Count Five); conspiring to provide, attempting to provide, and providing material support to terrorists in violation of 18 U.”
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Org., 60 F. Supp. 3d 509 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
“The predicate crimes that Plaintiffs assert Defendants are responsible for under their respondeat superior theory include: murder and attempted murder ( 18 U.”
United States v. DeAmaris, 406 F. Supp. 2d 748 (S.D. Tex. 2005).
· cites it 2× “§ 2332d(a), in the term “government facility” in 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(l), (b)(2)(E) and (e)(3), and in the term “government facility” in § 2339C(b)(l)(E)(ii) and (e)(2).”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a) — 2 cases
United States v. Capers, 20 F.4th 105 (2d Cir. 2021).
“2020) (discussing provision punishing conspiracies to plant bombs in public places where “death results” with death or life in prison, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2332f(a), 2332a(a)); see also United States v.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(1) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(2) — 7 cases
United States v. Defreitas, 718 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2013).
“On the same day, Defreitas, Kadir, Nur, and Ibrahim were charged by complaint with conspiracy to attack a public transportation system, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(2), (b)(1)(E), (b)(2)(A), and (c); conspiracy to destroy a building by fire or explosive, in violation of…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(l) — 3 cases
United States v. DeAmaris, 406 F. Supp. 2d 748 (S.D. Tex. 2005).
“§ 2332d(a), in the term “government facility” in 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(l), (b)(2)(E) and (e)(3), and in the term “government facility” in § 2339C(b)(l)(E)(ii) and (e)(2).”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(b)(2)(E) — 1 case
United States v. Hausa, 258 F. Supp. 3d 265 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
“Government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. There is no merit to this argument either.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(d)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Hausa, 258 F. Supp. 3d 265 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
“Government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. There is no merit to this argument either.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(d)(l) — 1 case
United States v. Hausa, 258 F. Supp. 3d 265 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
“Government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. There is no merit to this argument either.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(e)(12) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(e)(3) — 1 case
United States v. DeAmaris, 406 F. Supp. 2d 748 (S.D. Tex. 2005).
“§ 2332d(a), in the term “government facility” in 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(a)(l), (b)(2)(E) and (e)(3), and in the term “government facility” in § 2339C(b)(l)(E)(ii) and (e)(2).”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(e)(6) — 4 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(e)(8) — 1 case
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332f(e)(ll) — 1 case
United States v. Hausa, 258 F. Supp. 3d 265 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
“Government facility in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332f. There is no merit to this argument either.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.