18 U.S.C. § 2336
Other limitations
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Section applicable to any pending case or any cause of action arising on or after 4 years before
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2004–2023 · leading case: Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012).
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 474 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “The plaintiffs claims must be dismissed, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a), since his injuries were suffered during the course of an armed conflict between military forces; 3.”
Kaplan v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, 999 F.3d 842 (2d Cir. 2021). “2013) ("Kaplan versus Iranian banks I") (dismissing ATA claims complaining of 5 the 2006 Summer rocket attacks--brought by the same plaintiffs who brought Licci I-- 6 as beyond the scope of the ATA, given its exclusion of claims for injuries caused by 7 an "act of war," 18 U.”
Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 891 F. Supp. 2d 335 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “The plaintiffs claims must be dismissed, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a), since his injuries were suffered during the course of an armed conflict between military forces; 3.”
Joshua Atchley v. Astrazeneca UK Ltd., 22 F.4th 204 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “We also affirm the district court’s discretionary choice not to resolve on the pleadings defendants’ asserted act-of-war defense under 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a). See Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F.”
Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Gov't Auth., 412 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005). “§ 2381 and therefore the suit is barred by 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a). Although the Plaintiffs styled their pleading a “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,” it directly addresses each of the points raised in Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss and will be treated as a formal…”
Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Gov't Auth., 310 F. Supp. 2d 172 (D.D.C. 2004). “” 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a). “[T]he term ‘act of war’ means any act occurring in the course of — (A) declared war; (B) armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or (C) armed conflict between military forces of any origin[.”
Kaplan v. Bank Saderat PLC, 77 F.4th 110 (2d Cir. 2023). “2d at 199 , quoting 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a) (alteration and omission in original) (internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted).”
Morris v. Khadr, 415 F. Supp. 2d 1323 (D. Utah 2006). “18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a). 27 . See Holly Sugar Corp.”
In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc., 284 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (S.D. Fla. 2018). “Against this backdrop, Plaintiffs question, as a threshold matter, whether Chiquita carries its initial burden of demonstrating that duress is a valid legal defense to a civil ATA claim.”
Lelchook v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 224 F. Supp. 3d 108 (D. Mass. 2016). “at 199-201 ; see also 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a) (“No action shall be maintained .”
Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Org., 583 F. Supp. 2d 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). “” 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a). In pertinent part, “the term ‘act of war’ means any act occur *459 ring in the course of .”
Lelchook v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 199 F. Supp. 3d 314 (D. Mass. 2016). “” 18 U.S.C. § 2336 (a) (“No action shall be maintained .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.