Notes of Decisions
United States v. New York Tel. Co., 434 U.S. 159 (1977).
· cites it 2× “What the majority opinion fails to point out, however, is that in Title IX of that same Act, Congress enacted another, distinct provision extending the power of federal judges to issue search *183 warrants. That statute, which formed the basis of the 1972 amendment to Rule 41,…”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 265 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2003).
· cites it 3× “” Patriot Act, § 213, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b). Moreover, although in more limited circumstances, these new warrants may also authorize the seizure of tangible property.”
United States v. Joshua Welch, 811 F.3d 275 (8th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Title 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b) provides that notice of a warrant may be delayed if: (1)the court finds reasonable cause to believe that providing immediate notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse result .”
United States v. Mikos, 539 F.3d 706 (7th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 2× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3103a. Lack of seizure explains the "peek" part of the name; the "sneak" part comes from the fact that agents need not notify the owner until later.”
In re Jason Leopold to Unseal Certain Elec. Surveillance Applications, 300 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“§ 2703 (c) (governing compelled disclosure of basic subscriber information from electronic communications service and remote computing providers); 18 U.S.C. § 3103a (permitting covert searches if notice will cause an "adverse result"); 18 U.”
Donn Vonderahe & Barbara Vonderahe v. Roy H. Howland, 508 F.2d 364 (9th Cir. 1975).
“§ 3103a (authorizing the issuance of a warrant “to search for and seize any property that constitutes evidence of a criminal offense in violation of the laws of the United States”). The objects seized in Hayden were trousers, a jacket and a cap, items previously immune from…”
United States v. Iannelli, 339 F. Supp. 171 (W.D. Pa. 1972).
“See 18 U.S.C. § 3103a which embodies the holding of the Hayden decision.”
State v. Hamilton, 236 N.W.2d 325 (Iowa 1975).
“We now conclude there was probable cause for issuance of the warrant authorizing a search for “any and all controlled substances” despite the fact affiant’s personal knowledge may have been limited to contents of the package containing hashish.”
United States v. Rubio, 727 F.2d 786 (9th Cir. 1983).
“See also 18 U.S.C. § 3103a (a warrant may be issued to search for and seize any property that constitutes evidence of a criminal offense).”
Speake v. Grantham, 317 F. Supp. 1253 (S.D. Miss. 1970).
“2d 777 ; 18 U.S.C. § 3103a, 82 Stat. 238 (1968). 26 .”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(a) — 2 cases
— 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b) — 6 cases
United States v. Joshua Welch, 811 F.3d 275 (8th Cir. 2016).
“Title 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b) provides that notice of a warrant may be delayed if: (1)the court finds reasonable cause to believe that providing immediate notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse result .”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 265 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2003).
“” Patriot Act, § 213, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b). Moreover, although in more limited circumstances, these new warrants may also authorize the seizure of tangible property.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b)(2) — 1 case
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 265 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2003).
“” Patriot Act, § 213, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b). Moreover, although in more limited circumstances, these new warrants may also authorize the seizure of tangible property.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b)(3) — 2 cases
United States v. Joshua Welch, 811 F.3d 275 (8th Cir. 2016).
“Title 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b) provides that notice of a warrant may be delayed if: (1)the court finds reasonable cause to believe that providing immediate notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse result .”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 265 F. Supp. 2d 20 (D.D.C. 2003).
“” Patriot Act, § 213, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(b). Moreover, although in more limited circumstances, these new warrants may also authorize the seizure of tangible property.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3103a(d) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.