U.S. Code
»
Title 18
» Part PART II— CRIMINAL PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 206— PEN REGISTERS AND TRAP AND TRACE DEVICES
18 U.S.C. § 3126
Reports concerning pen registers and trap and trace devices
The Attorney General shall annually report to Congress on the number of pen register orders and orders for trap and trace devices applied for by law enforcement agencies of the Department of Justice, which report shall include information concerning—(1) the period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of the order;(2) the offense specified in the order or application, or extension of an order;(3) the number of investigations involved;(4) the number and nature of the facilities affected; and(5) the identity, including district, of the applying investigative or law enforcement agency making the application and the person authorizing the order.(Added Pub. L. 99–508, title III, § 301(a), Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1871, § 3125; renumbered § 3126, Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7092(a)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4410; amended Pub. L. 106–197, § 3, May 2, 2000, 114 Stat. 247.)Editorial NotesPrior ProvisionsA prior section 3126 was renumbered section 3127 of this title.
Amendments2000—Pub. L. 106–197 substituted “, which report shall include information concerning—” and pars. (1) to (5) for period at end.
1988—Pub. L. 100–690 renumbered section 3125 of this title as this section.
Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective DateSection effective 90 days after Oct. 21, 1986, and, in case of conduct pursuant to court order or extension, applicable only with respect to court orders and extensions made after such date, with special rule for State authorizations of interceptions, see section 302 of Pub. L. 99–508, set out as a note under section 3121 of this title.
Report on Use of DCS 1000 (Carnivore) To Implement Orders Under Section 3123Pub. L. 107–273, div. A, title III, § 305(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1782, provided that: “At the same time that the Attorney General submits to Congress the annual reports required by section 3126 of title 18, United States Code, that are respectively next due after the end of each of the fiscal years 2002 and 2003, the Attorney General shall also submit to the Chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and of the House of Representatives a report, covering the same respective time period, on the number of orders under section 3123 applied for by law enforcement agencies of the Department of Justice whose implementation involved the use of the DCS 1000 program (or any subsequent version of such program), which report shall include information concerning—“(1) the period of interceptions authorized by the order, and the number and duration of any extensions of the order;“(2) the offense specified in the order or application, or extension of an order;“(3) the number of investigations involved;“(4) the number and nature of the facilities affected;“(5) the identity of the applying investigative or law enforcement agency making the application for an order; and“(6) the specific persons authorizing the use of the DCS 1000 program (or any subsequent version of such program) in the implementation of such order.”
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Colon-Osorio, 360 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 2004).
“In this case, the plain error standard clearly is not met because Colón has failed to present us with a-plausible argument that his 1993 conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 3126 (a)(1) was for anything other than a felony.”
Shaktman v. State, 553 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 1989).
“This section shall not be construed to limit the public's right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law.”
Maryland Attorney Gen. Opinion 101OAG061 (Md. Att'y Gen. 2016).
· cites it 2× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3126 (3), (4) (1986). Gen. 61] 65 jurisdiction of a State authorized by the law of that State to enter orders authorizing the use of a pen register or a trap and trace device,” 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.