18 U.S.C. § 3632

Development of risk and needs assessment system

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—Not later than 210 days after the date of enactment of this subchapter, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Independent Review Committee authorized by the First Step Act of 2018, shall develop and release publicly on the Department of Justice website a risk and needs assessment system (referred to in this subchapter as the “System”), which shall be used to—(1) determine the recidivism risk of each prisoner as part of the intake process, and classify each prisoner as having minimum, low, medium, or high risk for recidivism;(2) assess and determine, to the extent practicable, the risk of violent or serious misconduct of each prisoner;(3) determine the type and amount of evidence-based recidivism reduction programming that is appropriate for each prisoner and assign each prisoner to such programming accordingly, and based on the prisoner’s specific criminogenic needs, and in accordance with subsection (b);(4) reassess the recidivism risk of each prisoner periodically, based on factors including indicators of progress, and of regression, that are dynamic and that can reasonably be expected to change while in prison;(5) reassign the prisoner to appropriate evidence-based recidivism reduction programs or productive activities based on the revised determination to ensure that—(A) all prisoners at each risk level have a meaningful opportunity to reduce their classification during the period of incarceration;(B) to address 11 So in original. the specific criminogenic needs of the prisoner; and(C) all prisoners are able to successfully participate in such programs;(6) determine when to provide incentives and rewards for successful participation in evidence-based recidivism reduction programs or productive activities in accordance with subsection (e);(7) determine when a prisoner is ready to transfer into prerelease custody or supervised release in accordance with section 3624; and(8) determine the appropriate use of audio technology for program course materials with an understanding of dyslexia.In carrying out this subsection, the Attorney General may use existing risk and needs assessment tools, as appropriate.(b)Assignment of Evidence-based Recidivism Reduction Programs.—The System shall provide guidance on the type, amount, and intensity of evidence-based recidivism reduction programming and productive activities that shall be assigned for each prisoner, including—(1) programs in which the Bureau of Prisons shall assign the prisoner to participate, according to the prisoner’s specific criminogenic needs; and(2) information on the best ways that the Bureau of Prisons can tailor the programs to the specific criminogenic needs of each prisoner so as to most effectively lower each prisoner’s risk of recidivism.(c)Housing and Assignment Decisions.—The System shall provide guidance on program grouping and housing assignment determinations and, after accounting for the safety of each prisoner and other individuals at the prison, provide that prisoners with a similar risk level be grouped together in housing and assignment decisions to the extent practicable.(d)Evidence-Based Recidivism Reduction Program Incentives and Productive Activities Rewards.—The System shall provide incentives and rewards for prisoners to participate in and complete evidence-based recidivism reduction programs as follows:(1)Phone and visitation privileges.—A prisoner who is successfully participating in an evidence-based recidivism reduction program shall receive—(A) phone privileges, or, if available, video conferencing privileges, for up to 30 minutes per day, and up to 510 minutes per month; and(B) additional time for visitation at the prison, as determined by the warden of the prison.(2)Transfer to institution closer to release residence.—A prisoner who is successfully participating in an evidence-based recidivism reduction program shall be considered by the Bureau of Prisons for placement in a facility closer to the prisoner’s release residence upon request from the prisoner and subject to—(A) bed availability at the transfer facility;(B) the prisoner’s security designation; and(C) the recommendation from the warden of the prison at which the prisoner is incarcerated at the time of making the request.(3)Additional policies.—The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall develop additional policies to provide appropriate incentives for successful participation and completion of evidence-based recidivism reduction programming. The incentives shall include not less than 2 of the following:(A) Increased commissary spending limits and product offerings.(B) Extended opportunities to access the email system.(C) Consideration of transfer to preferred housing units (including transfer to different prison facilities).(D) Other incentives solicited from prisoners and determined appropriate by the Director.(4)Time credits.—(A)In general.—A prisoner, except for an ineligible prisoner under subparagraph (D), who successfully completes evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities, shall earn time credits as follows:(i) A prisoner shall earn 10 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.(ii) A prisoner determined by the Bureau of Prisons to be at a minimum or low risk for recidivating, who, over 2 consecutive assessments, has not increased their risk of recidivism, shall earn an additional 5 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.(B)Availability.—A prisoner may not earn time credits under this paragraph for an evidence-based recidivism reduction program that the prisoner successfully completed—(i) prior to the date of enactment of this subchapter; or(ii) during official detention prior to the date that the prisoner’s sentence commences under section 3585(a).(C)Application of time credits toward prerelease custody or supervised release.—Time credits earned under this paragraph by prisoners who successfully participate in recidivism reduction programs or productive activities shall be applied toward time in prerelease custody or supervised release. The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall transfer eligible prisoners, as determined under section 3624(g), into prerelease custody or supervised release.(D)Ineligible prisoners.—A prisoner is ineligible to receive time credits under this paragraph if the prisoner is serving a sentence for a conviction under any of the following provisions of law:(i) Section 32, relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities.(ii) Section 33, relating to destruction of motor vehicles or motor vehicle facilities.(iii) Section 36, relating to drive-by shootings.(iv) Section 81, relating to arson within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction.(v) Section 111(b), relating to assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees using a deadly or dangerous weapon or inflicting bodily injury.(vi) Paragraph (1), (7), or (8) of section 113(a), relating to assault with intent to commit murder, assault resulting in substantial bodily injury to a spouse or intimate partner, a dating partner, or an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, or assault of a spouse, intimate partner, or dating partner by strangling, suffocating, or attempting to strangle or suffocate.(vii) Section 115, relating to influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official by injuring a family member, except for a threat made in violation of that section.(viii) Section 116, relating to female genital mutilation.(ix) Section 117, relating to domestic assault by a habitual offender.(x) Any section of chapter 10, relating to biological weapons.(xi) Any section of chapter 11B, relating to chemical weapons.(xii) Section 351, relating to Congressional, Cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination, kidnapping, and assault.(xiii) Section 521, relating to criminal street gangs.(xiv) Section 751, relating to prisoners in custody of an institution or officer.(xv) Section 793, relating to gathering, transmitting, or losing defense information.(xvi) Section 794, relating to gathering or delivering defense information to aid a foreign government.(xvii) Any section of chapter 39, relating to explosives and other dangerous articles, except for section 836 (relating to the transportation of fireworks into a State prohibiting sale or use).(xviii) Section 842(p), relating to distribution of information relating to explosives, destructive devices, and weapons of mass destruction, but only if the conviction involved a weapon of mass destruction (as defined in section 2332a(c)).(xix) Subsection (f)(3), (h), or (i) of section 844, relating to the use of fire or an explosive.(xx) Section 871, relating to threats against the President and successors to the Presidency.(xxi) Section 879, relating to threats against former Presidents and certain other persons.(xxii) Section 924(c), relating to unlawful possession or use of a firearm during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug trafficking crime.(xxiii) Section 1030(a)(1), relating to fraud and related activity in connection with computers.(xxiv) Section 1091, relating to genocide.(xxv) Any section of chapter 51, relating to homicide, except for section 1112 (relating to manslaughter), 1113 (relating to attempt to commit murder or manslaughter, but only if the conviction was for an attempt to commit manslaughter), 1115 (relating to misconduct or neglect of ship officers), or 1122 (relating to protection against the human immunodeficiency virus).(xxvi) Any section of chapter 55, relating to kidnapping.(xxvii) Any offense under chapter 77, relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking in persons, except for sections 1593 through 1596.(xxviii) Section 1751, relating to Presidential and Presidential staff assassination, kidnapping, and assault.(xxix) Section 1791, relating to providing or possessing contraband in prison.(xxx) Section 1792, relating to mutiny and riots.(xxxi) Section 1841(a)(2)(C), relating to intentionally killing or attempting to kill an unborn child.(xxxii) Section 1992, relating to terrorist attacks and other violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air.(xxxiii) Section 2113(e), relating to bank robbery resulting in death.(xxxiv) Section 2118(c), relating to robberies and burglaries involving controlled substances resulting in assault, putting in jeopardy the life of any person by the use of a dangerous weapon or device, or death.(xxxv) Section 2119, relating to taking a motor vehicle (commonly referred to as “carjacking”).(xxxvi) Any section of chapter 105, relating to sabotage, except for section 2152.(xxxvii) Any section of chapter 109A, relating to sexual abuse.(xxxviii) Section 2250, relating to failure to register as a sex offender.(xxxix) Section 2251, relating to the sexual exploitation of children.(xl) Section 2251A, relating to the selling or buying of children.(xli) Section 2252, relating to certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors.(xlii) Section 2252A, relating to certain activities involving material constituting or containing child pornography.(xliii) Section 2260, relating to the production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States.(xliv) Section 2283, relating to the transportation of explosive, biological, chemical, or radioactive or nuclear materials.(xlv) Section 2284, relating to the transportation of terrorists.(xlvi) Section 2291, relating to the destruction of a vessel or maritime facility, but only if the conduct that led to the conviction involved a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.(xlvii) Any section of chapter 113B, relating to terrorism.(xlviii) Section 2340A, relating to torture.(xlix) Section 2381, relating to treason.(l) Section 2442, relating to the recruitment or use of child soldiers.(li) An offense described in section 3559(c)(2)(F), for which the offender was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year, if the offender has a previous conviction, for which the offender served a term of imprisonment of more than 1 year, for a Federal or State offense, by whatever designation and wherever committed, consisting of murder (as described in section 1111), voluntary manslaughter (as described in section 1112), assault with intent to commit murder (as described in section 113(a)), aggravated sexual abuse and sexual abuse (as described in sections 2241 and 2242), abusive sexual contact (as described in sections 2244(a)(1) and (a)(2)), kidnapping (as described in chapter 55), carjacking (as described in section 2119), arson (as described in section 844(f)(3), (h), or (i)), or terrorism (as described in chapter 113B).(lii) Section 57(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2077(b)), relating to the engagement or participation in the development or production of special nuclear material.(liii) Section 92 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2122), relating to prohibitions governing atomic weapons.(liv) Section 101 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2131), relating to the atomic energy license requirement.(lv) Section 224 or 225 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2274, 2275), relating to the communication or receipt of restricted data.(lvi) Section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), relating to the sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel.(lvii)Section 60123(b) of title 49, relating to damaging or destroying a pipeline facility, but only if the conduct which led to the conviction involved a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.(lviii) Section 401(a) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841), relating to manufacturing or distributing a controlled substance in the case of a conviction for an offense described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (b)(1) of that section for which death or serious bodily injury resulted from the use of such substance.(lix) Section 276(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1326), relating to the reentry of a removed alien, but only if the alien is described in paragraph (1) or (2) of subsection (b) of that section.(lx) Section 277 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1327), relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States.(lxi) Section 278 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1328), relating to the importation of an alien into the United States for an immoral purpose.(lxii) Any section of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. 4611 et seq.) 22 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.(lxiii) Section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705).(lxiv) Section 601 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3121), relating to the protection of identities of certain United States undercover intelligence officers, agents, informants, and sources.(lxv) Subparagraph (A)(i) or (B)(i) of section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) or paragraph (1)(A) or (2)(A) of section 1010(b) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)), relating to manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with intent to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or knowingly importing or exporting, a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of heroin if the sentencing court finds that the offender was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense, as determined under the guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission.(lxvi) Subparagraph (A)(vi) or (B)(vi) of section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) or paragraph (1)(F) or (2)(F) of section 1010(b) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)), relating to manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide, or any analogue thereof.(lxvii) Subparagraph (A)(viii) or (B)(viii) of section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) or paragraph (1)(H) or (2)(H) of section 1010(b) the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)), relating to manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or knowingly importing or exporting, a mixture of substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, or salts of its isomers, if the sentencing court finds that the offender was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense, as determined under the guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission.(lxviii) Subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 401(b)(1) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) or paragraph (1) or (2) of section 1010(b) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 960(b)), relating to manufacturing, distributing, dispensing, or possessing with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance, or knowingly importing or exporting a controlled substance, if the sentencing court finds that—(I) the offense involved a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide, or any analogue thereof; and(II) the offender was an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense, as determined under the guidelines promulgated by the United States Sentencing Commission.(E)Deportable prisoners ineligible to apply time credits.—(i)In general.—A prisoner is ineligible to apply time credits under subparagraph (C) if the prisoner is the subject of a final order of removal under any provision of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))).(ii)Proceedings.—The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that any alien described in section 212 or 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182, 1227) who seeks to earn time credits are subject to proceedings described in section 238(a) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1228(a)) at a date as early as practicable during the prisoner’s incarceration.(5)Risk reassessments and level adjustment.—A prisoner who successfully participates in evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities shall receive periodic risk reassessments not less often than annually, and a prisoner determined to be at a medium or high risk of recidivating and who has less than 5 years until his or her projected release date shall receive more frequent risk reassessments. If the reassessment shows that the prisoner’s risk of recidivating or specific needs have changed, the Bureau of Prisons shall update the determination of the prisoner’s risk of recidivating or information regarding the prisoner’s specific needs and reassign the prisoner to appropriate evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities based on such changes.(6)Relation to other incentive programs.—The incentives described in this subsection shall be in addition to any other rewards or incentives for which a prisoner may be eligible.(e)Penalties.—The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall develop guidelines for the reduction of rewards and incentives earned under subsection (d) for prisoners who violate prison rules or evidence-based recidivism reduction program or productive activity rules, which shall provide—(1) general levels of violations and resulting reductions;(2) that any reduction that includes the loss of time credits shall require written notice to the prisoner, shall be limited to time credits that a prisoner earned as of the date of the prisoner’s rule violation, and shall not include any future time credits that the prisoner may earn; and(3) for a procedure to restore time credits that a prisoner lost as a result of a rule violation, based on the prisoner’s individual progress after the date of the rule violation.(f)Bureau of Prisons Training.—The Attorney General shall develop and implement training programs for Bureau of Prisons officers and employees responsible for administering the System, which shall include—(1) initial training to educate officers and employees on how to use the System in an appropriate and consistent manner, as well as the reasons for using the System;(2) continuing education;(3) periodic training updates; and(4) a requirement that such officers and employees demonstrate competence in administering the System, including interrater reliability, on a biannual basis.(g)Quality Assurance.—In order to ensure that the Bureau of Prisons is using the System in an appropriate and consistent manner, the Attorney General shall monitor and assess the use of the System, which shall include conducting annual audits of the Bureau of Prisons regarding the use of the System.(h)Dyslexia Screening.—(1)Screening.—The Attorney General shall incorporate a dyslexia screening program into the System, including by screening for dyslexia during—(A) the intake process; and(B) each periodic risk reassessment of a prisoner.(2)Treatment.—The Attorney General shall incorporate programs designed to treat dyslexia into the evidence-based recidivism reduction programs or productive activities required to be implemented under this section. The Attorney General may also incorporate programs designed to treat other learning disabilities.(Added Pub. L. 115–391, title I, § 101(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5196.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The date of enactment of this subchapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (d)(4)(B)(i), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 115–391, which was approved Dec. 21, 2018.

The First Step Act of 2018, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 115–391, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5194. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2018 Amendment note under section 1 of this title and Tables.

The Export Administration Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (d)(4)(D)(lxii), is Pub. L. 96–72, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 503, which was classified principally to chapter 56 (§ 4601 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, § 1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232, except for sections 11A, 11B, and 11C thereof (50 U.S.C. 4611, 4612, 4613).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,303 cases (1,291 in the last 5 years), 2019–2026 · leading case: Giovinco v. Pullen, 118 F.4th 527 (2d Cir. 2024).
Giovinco v. Pullen, 118 F.4th 527 (2d Cir. 2024). · cites it 6× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4). A prisoner is not eligible to earn such credits if he “is serving a sentence for a conviction” of certain enumerated offenses.”
Cheng v. United States, 132 F.4th 655 (2d Cir. 2025). · cites it 3× “Sheng-Wen Cheng challenges a provision of the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(E)(i), which distinguishes between noncitizen prisoners with a final order of removal and other prisoners in determining eligibility for good time credits.”
Jesus Ruiz v. United States, 990 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2021). “, 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D)(xxii) (rendering prisoners ineligible for time credit if convicted of a § 924(c) offense); 28 C.”
Emmanuel Bello-Arias, Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Berlin, Respondent, 2023 DNH 043 (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A). This case involves the latter.”
United States v. Daniel Draper, 84 F.4th 797 (9th Cir. 2023). “See 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A), (D)(xxv). This provision did not modify § 924(c) and has nothing to do with sentencing.”
Belin Gonzalez-Garcia, Petitioner v. FCI Berlin, Warden, Defendant, 2023 DNH 040 (D.N.H. 2023). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A). Time credits earned under that program “shall be applied toward time in prerelease custody or supervised release.”
Rivera-Perez v. Stover (2d Cir. 2026). · cites it 21× “Rivera-Perez’s petition alleged that the Bureau of Prisons miscalculated the time credits he had earned under the First Step Act (“FSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(C), and thereby * The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption as set forth above.”
Jackson Javier Batioja Cuero v. P Warden, FCI Berlin, 2024 DNH 075 (D.N.H. 2024). · cites it 5× “8), arguing that the petition should be denied because Batioja Cuero is subject to a final order of removal, rendering him ineligible for the application of FSA time credits, see 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(E)(i), and because he is ineligible for halfway house placement.”
Brown v. Penders, 101 F.4th 944 (1st Cir. 2024). “" 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A). Such time credits "shall be applied toward time in prerelease custody or supervised release.”
Bonnie v. Dunbar (D.S.C. 2024). · cites it 13× “§ 2241 , alleging that the BOP is denying him time credits he earned under the First Step Act of 2018 (“FSA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A), Pub. L. 115-391, 132 1 The background for this case is gleaned from a combination of the initial petition for a writ of habeas corpus under…”
Adepoju v. Scales (E.D. Va. 2025). · cites it 13× “01, First Step Act of 2018 — Time Credits: Procedures for Implementation of 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4). Cessation of Referral and Placement of Individuals with Immigration Detainers Effective immediately, pending placements in pre-release custody for application of Federal Time…”
Hare v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2021). · cites it 12× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (a); 3 Page citations to the Docket (“Dkt.”
Robert Valladares v. Heather Ray (4th Cir. 2025). · cites it 12× “One such exception, 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D)(lviii), makes ineligible those convicted of specific drug offenses where death resulted.”
Ashby v. Warden (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 12× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3632 . The Attorney General was charged with developing and releasing a Risk and Needs Assessment System (“the System”).”
Mateo v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 12× “§ 2241 to challenge his arrest and return to prison while he was in prerelease custody under time credits earned under the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (“First Step Act” or “FSA”), and the Second Chance Act, 18 U.”
Gregory Bonnie v. Warden Dunbar (4th Cir. 2025). · cites it 12× “18 U.S.C. § 3632 . The FSA, however, denies the particular benefit of jail-time credits to any prisoner “serving a sentence for a conviction under” 68 specified laws, including 18 U.”
Tayron Tyree Weeks, Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Berlin, Defendant, 2023 DNH 065 (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 3× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A). Time credits earned under that program “shall be applied toward time in prerelease custody or supervised release.”
Alatorre v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 11× “01, First Step Act of 2018 – Time Credits: Procedures for Implementation of 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4) . . . which . . .”
Rivera-Perez v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 11× “See 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A); 28 C.F.R. § 523.”
Gonzalez v. Herrera (9th Cir. 2025). · cites it 11× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(C). Petitioner Leon Gonzalez served his custodial sentence.”
Terrell Anthony Hargrove v. Ian Healy (6th Cir. 2025). · cites it 11× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(C) (emphasis added).”
White v. Warden, Fed. Corr. Inst. - Cumberland (D. Maryland 2023). · cites it 10× “01, First Step Act of 2018 – Time Credits: Procedures for Implementation of 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)). Mr. White has moved to strike Respondent’s correspondence as an impermissible surreply.”
Skanes v. Carter (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 10× “Further, Respondent argues that 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D) unambiguously authorized the actions of the BOP in precluding FSA time credits for Skanes because of his § 924(c) conviction.”
O'Bryan v. Cox (D.S.D. 2021). · cites it 9× “18 U.S.C. § 3632 (a).. That risk and needs assessment tool was required to be completed no later than July 19, 2019.”
Clinkenbeard v. King (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 9× “18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4). However, inmates serving sentences for certain crimes are ineligible to earn time credits.”
Jackson v. Wadas (S.D. Ind. 2025). · cites it 9× “" 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(A). The Court refers to these credits as "FSA credits" and evidence-based recidivism reduction programming as "EBRR programming.”
Hiciano v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 9× “2 Respondent argues that Petitioner is ineligible for time credits under the FSA because she was convicted of an offense enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D).3 In Petitioner’s Reply, she claims that the BOP violated her Equal Protection rights by deeming other inmates…”
Warden (E.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 9× “15, and filed a Traverse stating that his “case presents a pure question of law: whether the [BOP] may lawfully refuse to apply earned First Step Act time credits” and concerns the interpretation of two statutes: “Earning credits under 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)” and “Applying…”
(HC) Garcia v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 8× “27 1 § 1101(a)(17) and 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(E)). I have personally reviewed and can verify the existence of the Final Order of Removal, dated September 14, 1999, 2 that BOP obtained through the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement.”
(HC) Ramirez v. Phillips (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 8× “As relevant here, the FSA amended 18 U.S.C. § 3632 to require 4 the BOP to provide eligible prisoners the opportunity to participate in “evidence-based recidivism 5 reduction programs” and “productive activities” which in turn allows them to “earn time credits” 6 (FTCs).”
Mancillas v. Warden (D. Maryland 2023). · cites it 8× “Further, Respondent argues that the BOP “reasonably interpreted 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D) to preclude FSA time credits for [Mancillas] because of his § 924(c) conviction,” and that interpretation is entitled to deference.”
Kurti v. Douglas K. White, Warden (M.D. Penn. 2020). · cites it 8× “) For the reasons that follow, the court will deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Following an order to show cause, Doc.”
Dunn v. Carver (S.D.W. Va 2021). · cites it 8× “May 24, 2019); also see 18 U.S.C. § 3632 . Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (a), the Attorney General was directed to develop and release publicly on the Department of Justice website a risk and needs assessment system no later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of the…”
Camacho-Castillo v. Dulgov (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 8× “(quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (a)). “An eligible prisoner can earn 10 days 12 13 (plus an additional five days if he meets the criteria for minimum or low risk of recidivism) 14 of FSA time credits ‘for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence-based 15 recidivism…”
Crowe v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (D.D.C. 2025). · cites it 8× “” 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(C) (emphasis added).”
Walker (S.D.W. Va 2025). · cites it 8× “He further argues that he has earned a risk 1 The FSA, enacted on December 21, 2018, allows eligible federal prisoners who have not committed offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D) to earn 10 to 15 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in…”
Castro (D. Conn. 2026). · cites it 8× “Respondent counters that Lemus Castro “is statutorily ineligible to apply time credits” under 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(E) “because he is subject to a final order of removal.”
Olu Victor Alonge, Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Berlin, Respondent, 2024 DNH 076 (D.N.H. 2024). · cites it 2× “See generally 18 U.S.C.A. § 3632 (d)(4). Indeed, Alonge’s enrollment in the Institutional Hearing Program is entirely consistent with the First Step Act, which provides that, “The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall ensure that any…”
(HC) Morales v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 7×
Samoiloff v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 7×
Huihui v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 7×
Purdy v. LeJeune (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 7×
White v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 7×
Bains v. Quay (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 7×
Villagomez v. Knight (D.S.C. 2021). · cites it 7×
Puana v. Williams (D. Colo. 2024). · cites it 7×
Cramer v. Gunther (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 7×
Sanchez v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 7× “18 U.S.C. § 3632 (a)–(d). Under the FSA, federal prisoners who meet certain criteria, including engaging in recidivism reduction programs, are entitled to earn a number of time credits to be applied towards prerelease custody or early supervised release.”
Martinez v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025). · cites it 7× “(quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3632 (d)(4)(D)) (emphasis added by Petitioner).”
(HC) Ballesteros-Duarte v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 6×
(HC) Mancillas Medina v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 6×
(HC) Rosas v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 6×
(HC) Head v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 6×
(HC) Jobin v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 6×
Caudillo v. Carter (D. Colo. 2022). · cites it 6×
Vieth v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2021). · cites it 6×
Bradford v. Warden (S.D. Ind. 2024). · cites it 6×
Martin v. Beard (E.D. Ky. 2021). · cites it 6×
Calderon Hernandez v. Warden FMC Devens (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 6×
Potarazu v. Warden, Fed. Corr. Inst.- Cumberland (D. Maryland 2023). · cites it 6×
Goodman v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2020). · cites it 6×
Teed v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 6×
Garza-Guerra v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 6×
Osorio v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 6×
Poff v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 6×
United States v. Stedman (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 6×
(HC) Ramos v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 6× “As set forth above, 21 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
(HC) Briones-Pereyra v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 6× “As set forth above, under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime 11 credits earned .”
Churuk v. Warden (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 6×
Barnes v. Warden (D. Maryland 2024). · cites it 6×
Hargrove v. Warden Healy (N.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 6×
Stevens v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2024). · cites it 6×
Patel v. Barron (W.D. Wash. 2023). · cites it 6× “18 U.S.C § 3632(d). One such incentive was the awarding of “time credits” to “be applied toward time in 11 prerelease custody or supervised release” upon eligible inmates’ successful completion of anti-recidivism programming.”
Nevel v. Brown (N.D.W. Va. 2023). · cites it 6×
Harleman v. Warden (W.D. Wash. 2024). · cites it 6×
Stinson v. Martinez (W.D. La. 2024). · cites it 6×
Gale v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 6×
Hill v. King (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 6×
Ruiz v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 6×
Palmer v. Flowers (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 6×
Athikulrat v. Cooper (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 6×
Hutson v. Pistro (N.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 6×
Gustinski v. Joseph, Warden (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 6×
Folk v. Howard (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 6×
Hahn v. S. Janson (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 6×
Delorenzo v. Nunley (W.D. Va. 2025). · cites it 6×
Moore v. Cooper (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 6×
Johnston (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 6×
Ardoin (W.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 6×
Francoeur (D. Mass. 2025). · cites it 6×
Rubinstein (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 6×
Dustin Joseph v. Warden, FCI-Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 6×
Block (D. Mass. 2026). · cites it 6×
Moparty (W.D. La. 2026). · cites it 6×
Yauger (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 6×
United States v. Bikundi (D.D.C. 2022). · cites it 5×
Green v. Hudson (10th Cir. 2024). · cites it 5×
(HC)Heath v. Warden at FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 5×
(HC) Doran v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 5×
(HC) Rodriguez-Cardona v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 5×
(HC) Nuno Urenda v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 5×
(HC)Izaguirre-Guerrero v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 5×
Nunez v. Carter (D. Colo. 2022). · cites it 5×
Atiyas v. Stover (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Davis v. Williams (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 5×
Williams v. Warden (S.D. Ind. 2024). · cites it 5×
Brown v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2022). · cites it 5×
Albarran v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 5×
SOHL v. United States (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 5×
Duyzings v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 5×
Rosenberg v. Pliler (S.D.N.Y. 2021). · cites it 5×
Rehfuss v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 5×
Teed v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Annor v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Garcia v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Cedano-Sanchez v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Parker v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Henareh v. Arviza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 5×
Ramirez v. Washington (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 5×
Mohammad Omar v. Arviza (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 5×
(HC)Perez-Valencia v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 5× “As set forth above, 16 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
(HC) Arellano-Cigfuego v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 5× “As set forth above, 15 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
Sinek v. United States (N.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 5×
Bortner v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 5×
Pelullo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low (M.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 5×
Williams v. C. Carter (D. Maryland 2024). · cites it 5×
Pasha v. Carter (D. Maryland 2024). · cites it 5×
Batioja Cuero v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2024). · cites it 5×
Rodriquez v. LSCI-Allenwood (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 5×
Alvarez-Garcia v. United States (N.D. Tex. 2024). · cites it 5×
Neal v. Martinez (W.D. La. 2024). · cites it 5×
Henny v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 5×
Heath v. Knight (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 5×
Said v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 5×
Harriot v. Jamison (S.D.N.Y. 2025). · cites it 5×
Cox v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 5×
Iverson v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 5×
(HC) Kuzmenko v. Phillips (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 5×
(HC) Martin v. Phillips (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 5×
(HC) Kuzmenko v. Phillips (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 5×
Robinson v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 5×
Odeh v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I (M.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 5×
Gonzalez-Alvarado v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025). · cites it 5×
Conley v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025). · cites it 5×
Harleman v. Warden (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 5×
Duah v. Puzio (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 5×
Cano v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2025). · cites it 5×
Gibson v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 5×
Tovar (PS) v. Williams (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 5×
Gilmer v. Warden FCI Edgefield (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 5×
Majid v. Warden (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 5×
Cochran v. United States (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 5×
Tinsley v. Carter (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 5×
Magana-herrera v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 5×
Banks (E.D. Ky. 2025). · cites it 5×
Birkholz (C.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 5×
Gibson (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 5×
Nieto-Molina (E.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 5×
Warden (E.D. Cal. 2026). · cites it 5×
Barker (D.S.D. 2026). · cites it 5×
Hernandez-Boria (D. Conn. 2026). · cites it 5×
Vigil (D. Colo. 2026). · cites it 5×
Miles v. Bowers (1st Cir. 2026). · cites it 5×
Raymond Johnson v. Warden Allenwood FCI (3rd Cir. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Morales v. Warden at FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 4×
(HC) Casellas v. Arviza (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 4×
(HC) Lopez-Diaz v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC)Bautista v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Olguin-Hernandez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Sayasane v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Morales-Ramirez v. Arviza (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
Mohammed v. Stover (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Mohammed v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 4×
Keegan v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 4×
LaPuente, Jr. v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 4×
Corbeil v. Entzel (C.D. Ill. 2020). · cites it 4×
Lane v. Sproul (S.D. Ill. 2022). · cites it 4×
Markley v. James (D. Kan. 2021). · cites it 4×
Adkins v. Carter (D. Kan. 2024). · cites it 4×
Cook v. Hemingway (E.D. Mich. 2022). · cites it 4×
Fontanez v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 4×
Eviglo v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 4×
Davis v. Rardin (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 4×
Windle v. Knight (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 4×
Pineda v. Warden (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 4×
Lallave v. Martinez (E.D.N.Y 2022). · cites it 4×
Lallave v. Carvajal (E.D.N.Y 2022). · cites it 4×
Rubinov v. W.S. Pliler (S.D.N.Y. 2021). · cites it 4×
Person Doe v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (S.D.N.Y. 2024). · cites it 4×
Ware v. Quay (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 4×
Rosario v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 4×
Delahoz v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 4×
Santillan v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Rodriguez v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Duffis v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Rogers-Watts v. Bureau of Prisons (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Perez-Rodriguez v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Khatiwala v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Bonilla Mesa v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
Hamrick v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 4×
United States v. Lyons (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 4×
Lopez v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Hernandez-Velasquez v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Salazar-Mendoza v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Tennigkeit v. Taylor (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4×
(HC) Pina v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 4× “) 6 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
Preciado v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 4×
Whitfield v. Sproul (S.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 4×
Hernandez v. Carter (D. Maryland 2024). · cites it 4×
Williams v. Warden Low Allenwood (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 4×
Huerta v. United States (N.D. Tex. 2023). · cites it 4×
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval (W.D. Va. 2024). · cites it 4×
Deptula v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 4×
Luna De La Cruz, Wellington v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 4×
Dyson v. Wadas (S.D. Ind. 2024). · cites it 4×
Lobon Rivas v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2024). · cites it 4×
Smith v. Ray (N.D.W. Va. 2024). · cites it 4×
Hernandez-Medina v. King (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 4×
Montano v. King (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 4×
Gonzalez v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 4×
Tumbaco Malave v. United States (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 4×
Burchard v. Garrett (E.D. Ark. 2024). · cites it 4×
Brennerman v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 4×
Claude v. FCI Danbury (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 4×
Gilmore v. Puzio (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 4×
(HC) Abramian v. Taylor (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 4×
Torres, Jaime v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 4×
Fletcher v. Sproul (S.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 4×
Loera v. Hijar (W.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 4×
Bueno v. R. Thompson (fci Fort Dix) (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 4×
(HC) Cunningham v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 4×
Rollins v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 4×
Fargesen v. Fpc Pensacola (N.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 4×
Thomas v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 4× “18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A)-(C). Prisoners are ineligible to receive time 14 credits if they are serving a sentence for a conviction listed in 18 U.”
Fears v. FCI La Tuna (W.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 4×
Plain v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 4×
Haamid (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 4×
Marigny (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 4×
Harron (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 4×
Darrell T. Washington v. FCI Williamsburg Warden (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 4×
Hernandez (D. Or. 2026). · cites it 4×
Saldana (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 4×
Carter (D.S.D. 2026). · cites it 4×
Doobay (W.D. La. 2026). · cites it 4×
Robinson (E.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 4×
Chang (D. Conn. 2026). · cites it 4×
Wilbert A. Theodore v. B.D. Walker, Warden (N.D. Ala. 2026). · cites it 4×
Sanchez-Garcia (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 4×
Haywood (C.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 4×
Wilson (C.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 4×
Nunez (N.D. Ala. 2026). · cites it 4×
Patel (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 4×
Clayburn (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 4×
Haleem McCoy v. FCI Berlin, Warden, 2024 DNH 030 (D.N.H. 2024).
Volodymyr Kvashuk v. Warden, FCI Berlin, 2024 DNH 087 (D.N.H. 2020).
Noe v. True (10th Cir. 2022). · cites it 3×
Mauricio Herrera Hernandez v. B. Birkholz (C.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
Bray v. Yates (E.D. Ark. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Hand v. Barr (E.D. Cal. 2021). · cites it 3×
(HC) Garrido v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Galaz v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Muniz v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Lam v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Delacruz v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Mendoza v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Solis-Torres v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 3×
(HC) Limon-Uribe v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 3×
(HC) Pineda-Castro v. Warden, FCI Herlong (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 3×
(HC) Galindo-Murrillo v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 3×
(HC) Iqbal v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 3×
Noe v. True (D. Colo. 2024). · cites it 3×
Giovinco v. Pullen (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Flete-Garcia v. Stover (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Snyder v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 3×
Villegas-Escobar v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 3×
Sparrow v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 3×
Soto v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 3×
Kennedy-Robey v. Entzel (C.D. Ill. 2021). · cites it 3×
Booker v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2022). · cites it 3×
White v. Rule (S.D. Ind. 2024). · cites it 3×
Adkins v. Carter (D. Kan. 2024). · cites it 3×
Hedges v. United States Marshals Serv. (E.D. Ky. 2022). · cites it 3×
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 3×
Brown v. Rieger (D. Me. 2022). · cites it 3×
Smith v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 3×
Pospech v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 3×
Keahbone v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 3×
Jenkins v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 3×
Henny v. United States of Am. (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 3×
Weeks v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 3×
Rizk v. Warden Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 3×
Rodriguez v. Knight (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 3×
Nichols v. Knight (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 3×
Perri v. Warden of F.C.I. Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 3×
Rosales v. Petrucci (S.D.N.Y. 2021). · cites it 3×
Cheng v. United States (S.D.N.Y. 2024). · cites it 3× “§ 701 , et seq., and the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”), 28 U.”
Shipman v. Cox (N.D. Ohio 2022). · cites it 3×
Nycklass v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 3×
Ware v. Quay (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 3×
Jimenez v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 3×
Silva v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Bell v. Finley (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Showell v. FCI-Schuylkill (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Ramirez v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Holmes v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
McLoughlin v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Keitt v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Johnson v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Batista v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Camara v. Bureau of Prisons (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Delgado v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Rhodes v. Bureau of Prisons (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
McCoy, Jr. v. Baraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Dean v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Hills v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Williams v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Hinton v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Minaya-Rodriguez v. Warden (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 3×
Ulloa v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 3×
Benson v. Warden, FCI Edgefield (D.S.C. 2024). · cites it 3×
Whitaker v. Cox (D.S.D. 2021). · cites it 3×
Holt v. Warden (D.S.D. 2021). · cites it 3×
Ragsdale v. Cox (D.S.D. 2021). · cites it 3×
Dyer v. Fulgam (E.D. Tenn. 2022). · cites it 3×
Hills v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021). · cites it 3×
Griffin v. Garrett (E.D. Ark. 2024). · cites it 3×
Fall v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 3×
Haley v. Warden Bowers (D. Mass. 2024). · cites it 3×
Reynolds v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 3×
Anderson v. Knight (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 3×
Ramirez Carvallos v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 3×
Whitaker v. Cox (D.S.D. 2021). · cites it 3× ““who successfully completes evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
Hassan v. Warden Hijar (W.D. Tex. 2023). · cites it 3× “His petition is denied because it appears from its face and the attached exhibits that he is not entitled to § 2241 relief.”
Martinez v. Rosalez (W.D. Tex. 2023). · cites it 3× “”18 U.S.C. § 3632(a). Second, the BOP was required to “implement and complete the initial intake risk and needs assessment for each prisoner.”
Banks v. Warden of USP Lee (W.D. Va. 2023). · cites it 3×
Banks v. USP Lee (W.D. Va. 2023). · cites it 3×
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval (W.D. Va. 2024). · cites it 3×
Savla, Vishal v. Marske, Matthew (W.D. Wis. 2021). · cites it 3×
Turner, Justin v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022). · cites it 3×
Brandon v. Carver (S.D.W. Va 2022). · cites it 3×
King v. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 3×
Hernandez v. Warden (W.D. Tex. 2024). · cites it 3×
Williamson v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 3×
Hoehn v. Warden Fci Marianna (N.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 3×
Martinez v. Monarez (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 3×
Hill v. Ciolli (D. Colo. 2024). · cites it 3×
Zambrano-Cedeno v. Martinez (W.D. La. 2024). · cites it 3×
Yakubu v. Joseph (D.S.C. 2024). · cites it 3×
Garcia v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 3×
Vanin-Vergara v. Rardin (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 3×
Paul Nicoletti v. M. Bayless (4th Cir. 2025). · cites it 3×
Cobena Lopez, Jordi v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 3×
Akhatsegbe v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
McCoy v. Heckard (S.D.W. Va 2025). · cites it 3×
Hubbard v. Carter (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 3×
Portocarrero-Valencia v. Warden (S.D.N.Y. 2025). · cites it 3×
Richman v. Graham (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 3×
(HC) Rodriguez-Garcia v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 3×
Spencer v. Hutchinson (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 3×
Adams v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 3×
Wendring v. Stalhood (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 3×
Harris v. Warden (D. Kan. 2025). · cites it 3×
Melton v. Helaire (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 3×
Ferebe v. Jamison (S.D.N.Y. 2025). · cites it 3×
Holland v. Gabby (N.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 3×
Barry v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Patel v. Cooper (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 3×
Hawkins, II v. FCI Allenwood (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Jennings v. Warden FCI Florence (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 3×
Radulescu, Alexandru v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 3×
Leonides-Torres, Ricardo v. FCI Oxford's Warden (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 3×
Ordonez-Rivera, Hernan v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 3×
Garrett v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 3×
Voisine v. Warden (W.D. Okla. 2025). · cites it 3×
Daniels v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons (D.N.H. 2025). · cites it 3×
Poynter v. Humphrey (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 3×
Ngon v. Warden (S.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 3×
Carey v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2025). · cites it 3×
Woolsey v. Keyes (INMATE 1) (M.D. Ala. 2025). · cites it 3×
Fletcher v. Sproul (S.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 3×
Brown v. Warden of FPC-Lewisburg (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Ath v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Smith v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Carlson v. Bowers (D. Mass. 2025). · cites it 3×
(HC) Balli v. Warden of FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 3×
Guerrero v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 3×
Reyna (M.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 3×
Davis (M.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 3×
Vang (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 3×
Davis (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 3×
White (W.D. Ky. 2025). · cites it 3×
Modeste (D. Alaska 2025). · cites it 3×
Robert Bennett v. Eric Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 3×
Popoola (E.D. Va. 2025). · cites it 3×
Warden (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 3×
Edge (W.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 3×
Torres v. Warden (2d Cir. 2026). · cites it 3×
Sanchez-Gonzalez (D.P.R. 2026). · cites it 3×
Alexandre (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 3×
Tomlinson (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 3×
Ngon (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 3×
Stepan Botsvynyuk v. Warden E. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2026). · cites it 3×
Essenfeld (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 3×
Whited (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 3×
Phillips (W.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 3×
Ramon Fabela v. Warden E. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2026). · cites it 3×
Robinson (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 3×
Rahshjeem Benson v. Warden FCI Edgefield (4th Cir. 2026). · cites it 3×
Harris v. Warden (10th Cir. 2026). · cites it 3×
Andrade (S.D. Miss. 2026). · cites it 3×
Guevara (M.D. Ala. 2026). · cites it 3×
Harrison (W.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 3×
Feurtado (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 3×
Contreras (E.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 3×
United States v. Edwin Tavarez, 141 F.4th 750 (6th Cir. 2025).
Falcetta v. Rosalez (5th Cir. 2024). · cites it 2×
Craig Shults v. Brian Birkholz (C.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
Johnston v. Colbert (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2×
Jones v. Hendrix (E.D. Ark. 2021). · cites it 2×
Rose v. Yates (E.D. Ark. 2023). · cites it 2×
Satizabal v. Edge (E.D. Ark. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC)Juarez v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021). · cites it 2×
(HC) Kobel v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021). · cites it 2×
(HC)Ochoa v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC) Kelley v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC)Guzman v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC) Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC)Brown v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC) Marquez-Huazo v. Warden of FCI-Herlong (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC) Mohammad v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
(HC) Diez-Morejon v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Montenegro Salazar v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Otuya v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Lima v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Del Pino v. Warden, FCI Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Odoffin v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Hernandez-Cano v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Gutierrez v. Warden, FCI-Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Florez v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Martin v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Calzada v. B.M. Trate (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Alvarez v. Arviza (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(HC) Bueno-Martinez v. FCI Mendota Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023). · cites it 2×
(hc) Tieu v. USA (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2×
Lara v. Jusino (N.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
Sampson v. United States (S.D. Cal. 2022). · cites it 2×
Noe v. True (D. Colo. 2022). · cites it 2×
Milchin v. Warden (D. Conn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Szanyi v. Pullen (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Pujols v. Nash (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Clark v. Jamison (D. Conn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Thompson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low (M.D. Fla. 2023). · cites it 2×
Silva v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low (M.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 2×
Marler v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 2×
Dejapa v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 2×
Hemon v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023). · cites it 2×
Villegas-Escobar v. Derr (D. Haw. 2024). · cites it 2×
Vieth v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2021). · cites it 2×
Graham v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2023). · cites it 2×
Haynes v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2023). · cites it 2×
Cruz v. F.C.I. Greenville (S.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 2×
Ford v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2021). · cites it 2×
Vonderahe v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2022). · cites it 2×
Daniel v. Carter (D. Kan. 2024). · cites it 2×
Price v. Gilley (E.D. Ky. 2020). · cites it 2×
Lantigua v. Beard (E.D. Ky. 2020). · cites it 2×
Robey v. Gilley (E.D. Ky. 2021). · cites it 2×
Thomas v. Paul (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 2×
Gordon v. Paul (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 2×
Mayhew v. LeMaster (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 2×
Bailey v. United States Prob. Off. (E.D. Ky. 2023). · cites it 2×
Hulse v. LeMaster (E.D. Ky. 2024). · cites it 2×
Pierce v. LeMaster (E.D. Ky. 2024). · cites it 2×
Nygren v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2021). · cites it 2×
Winegar v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2022). · cites it 2×
Gelagotis v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 2×
Fischer v. Napier (D. Mass. 2023). · cites it 2×
Schmitt v. Bowers (D. Mass. 2024). · cites it 2×
Borker v. Warden Bowers (D. Mass. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hoss v. Warden (D. Maryland 2022). · cites it 2× “Hoss explains that under Title “18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A)(i) a prisoner is entitled to earn 10 days of FTC for every 30 days of successful evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
Caldwell v. Weber (D. Maryland 2024). · cites it 2×
Allegra v. Hemingway (E.D. Mich. 2021). · cites it 2×
Williams v. Marques (D. Minnesota 2019). · cites it 2×
Mills v. Starr (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Laksonen v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Spang v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Robinson v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Marcks v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Garcia v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Griffis v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2× “) Griffis acknowledges that she is a medium recidivism risk level but argues that she is entitled to the application of earned time credits under the FSA regardless of her recidivism risk level. (Id.”
Stamps v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Robinson v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2×
Martinez v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Ealey v. United States (D. Neb. 2022). · cites it 2×
Bello-Arias v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 2×
Tiberiu Oprea v. FCI Berlin, Warden (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 2×
Simon v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2021). · cites it 2×
Moody v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2022). · cites it 2×
Fisher v. Knight (D.N.J. 2023). · cites it 2×
Nichols v. Knight (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hammond v. United States (D.N.M. 2022). · cites it 2×
Distefano v. Pliler (S.D.N.Y. 2021). · cites it 2×
Rosales v. Petrucci (S.D.N.Y. 2022). · cites it 2×
Martinez-Palacios v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2023). · cites it 2×
Lopez-Chavez v. Elkton (N.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 2×
Alexander v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 2×
Dittmar v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2023). · cites it 2×
Billingsley v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2024). · cites it 2×
Rominger v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021). · cites it 2×
Hernandez v. United States of Am. (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Navarro-Velez v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood (Medium) (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Brown v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Howard v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Wells v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2022). · cites it 2×
Powell v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Sanders v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Hall v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Destilus v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Hill v. Bradley (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Navarro v. Baraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Whitbeck v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Lewis v. Jamison (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Maldonado v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Wegmann v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Pisman v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Jones v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Whitlock v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Lewis v. Jamison (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Teay Story v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Chambers v. Bureau of Prisons (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Camara v. Warden (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Hoff v. Krueger (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Gonzalez v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Johnson v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023). · cites it 2×
Negron-Soto v. Knight (D.S.C. 2023). · cites it 2× “As to the merits of the petition: Petitioner asserts that he earned time credits per the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A). ECF No. 1 at 2.”
Iro v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021). · cites it 2×
Burtons v. Warden (N.D. Tex. 2021). · cites it 2×
Chavez v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021). · cites it 2×
State of Oklahoma v. Tellez (N.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2×
Torres v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hassan v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2×
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden (C.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hernandez v. United States (S.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2×
Cicchiello v. Peters (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 2×
Gardner v. Warden (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 2×
Smith v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024). · cites it 2×
De Los Santos v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low (M.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 2×
Woodside, Rashad v. Miami Residential Reentry Off. (S.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 2×
Markovich v. Heuett (S.D. Fla. 2024). · cites it 2×
Abbott v. Bergami (N.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 2×
Bush v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024). · cites it 2×
Andrews v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 2×
Chavez-Arriaga v. Hemingway (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 2×
Clinkenbeard v. United States of Am. (D.D.C. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hubbard v. United States of Am. Bureau of Prisons (W.D.N.C. 2024). · cites it 2×
Severino v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 2×
Bonner v. Warden (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 2×
Kowalewski v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2024). · cites it 2×
Rodriguez-Morales v. Jaimison (S.D.N.Y. 2024). · cites it 2×
Orozco v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2024). · cites it 2×
Arias v. Arviza (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 2×
Shuttleworth v. Green (M.D. Penn. 2024). · cites it 2×
Wong v. Warden, Yankton Fed. Prison Camp (D.S.D. 2024). · cites it 2×
Falcetta v. Rosalez (W.D. Tex. 2022). · cites it 2×
Little v. Andrews (E.D. Va. 2021). · cites it 2×
Xeko, Buddy v. Marske, Matthew (W.D. Wis. 2021). · cites it 2×
Parcon, Raymond v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022). · cites it 2×
Turner, Justin v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022). · cites it 2×
Horning, Douglas v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023). · cites it 2×
Sharp v. Brown (N.D.W. Va. 2024). · cites it 2×
Waters v. Ray (N.D.W. Va. 2024). · cites it 2×
Saleh v. Young (S.D.W. Va 2021). · cites it 2×
Parrish v. Young (S.D.W. Va 2022). · cites it 2×
Sichting v. Rardin (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Benitez-Diaz, Alberto v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2024). · cites it 2×
(HC)Perlaza v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). · cites it 2×
Herrera v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2024). · cites it 2× “” 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). Petitioner does not have any liberty interest in receiving his FSA credits, thus, his due process claim is without merit.”
Dane v. Bayless (N.D.W. Va. 2024). · cites it 2×
McDuff v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low (E.D. Tex. 2024). · cites it 2×
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons (D.N.H. 2024). · cites it 2×
Hassan v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2024). · cites it 2×
Stewart v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Sichting v. Rardin (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Abieanga v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Gallop v. Bureau of Prisons (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Faleide v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024). · cites it 2×
Bilodeau v. United States (D.S.C. 2024). · cites it 2×
Kavaja, Aleksandar v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Laje Hurtado, Tonni v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Cargill v. Warden Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025). · cites it 2× “” 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). On January 19, 2009, DHS issued a Notice and Order of Expedited Removal (“NOER”) under § 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) against Petitioner deeming him inadmissible to the United States under § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the INA (the…”
King v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 2×
Chocon-Gomez v. King (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2×
Houston v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 2×
Frierson v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
(HC) Dillon v. Taylor (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
Kornegay v. Brown (N.D.W. Va. 2025). · cites it 2×
Pratcher v. Garrett (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 2×
Hill v. Gunther (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 2×
Paw v. Neely (N.D. Ala. 2025). · cites it 2×
Smith v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2×
(HC) Castle v. Bureau of Prisons (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
Mannino v. Stalhood (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 2×
Lozano v. Warden FSL Jesup (S.D. Ga. 2025). · cites it 2×
Rico-lopez v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Leverette v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Antoine v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
Lewis v. Warden of FCI-Schuylkill (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 2×
(HC) Garcia v. Warden Taylor (E.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
Harris v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Rodriguez-diaz v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Jimenez v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025). · cites it 2×
Sarkisov v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 2×
Lattieri v. Unit Team Manager English (D. Mass. 2025). · cites it 2×
Freeman v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 2×
Vargas v. Rivers (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2×
Sosonko v. Peters (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 2× “And under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D), a prisoner is ineligible to receive earned time credit if he is serving a sentence for a conviction under any section of chapter 55, related to kidnapping.”
Shah v. Peters (S.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
Mosley v. Helaire (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 2×
Espana-martinez v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Garcia v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2× “See18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4). The BOP applied 365 days of FSA time credits to his sentence toward early release.”
Martinez-polanco v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Martinez Polanco v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Regla-Araujo v. Warden, FCI Elkton (N.D. Ohio 2025). · cites it 2×
Martinez v. Fed. Prison Camp (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 2×
Ramos v. Warden (S.D. Miss. 2025). · cites it 2×
Wilborn v. Gunther (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 2×
Quintana v. Saulsberry (N.D. Fla. 2025). · cites it 2×
Stammers, Scott v. Emmerich, Warden (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Freeman v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Calderon Lima, Roberto v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Copete-Lozano, William v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Calderon Lima, Roberto v. Dep't of Homeland Sec. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Tinlin v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025). · cites it 2×
Stinson v. Martinez (5th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2×
Terrell v. Entzel (E.D. Ky. 2025). · cites it 2×
Higinio Noya-Rodriguez v. B. Birkholz (C.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
Rattanavong v. Warden FCI Sandstone (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2×
Mosquera v. United States (S.D. Miss. 2025). · cites it 2×
Solar-Chima, Jorge v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Robinson v. Davis (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 2×
Keegan v. United States (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 2×
Gongora, Edmundo v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Howell v. Napier (D.S.C. 2025). · cites it 2× “See 18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A). However, an inmate may not earn FSA credits if they are serving a sentence for any of the 72 disqualifying offenses specified in 18 U.”
Lowmaster v. Jones (D. Colo. 2025). · cites it 2×
Bridges v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 2×
Stark, Jr. v. Lammer (N.D. Ill. 2025). · cites it 2×
Powell v. Humphrey (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 2×
Garcia-Lopez, Arturo v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Moncayo Urbina, Jorge v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Martinez, Rosendo v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Casseus, Vincent v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Magana-Guzman v. United States (W.D. Wash. 2025). · cites it 2×
Clark v. Edge (W.D. Tex. 2025). · cites it 2×
Nwafor v. Warden, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Familia-Moreta, Michel v. FCI Oxford's Warden (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Chiquito Pinargote, Jose v. Oxford's Warden (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
Henderson v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Morales v. United States (D.N.H. 2025). · cites it 2×
Tate v. Martinez (W.D. La. 2025). · cites it 2×
Causey v. F C I Oakdale (W.D. La. 2025). · cites it 2×
Overton v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
Ashby v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025). · cites it 2×
Curry v. Cruz (S.D. Ga. 2025). · cites it 2×
Martinez (W.D. La. 2025). · cites it 2×
Woods (M.D. Penn. 2025). · cites it 2×
Mario Ruiz Tapia v. Warden E. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2025). · cites it 2×
McMiller (D. Maryland 2025). · cites it 2×
Landis v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (D.D.C. 2025). · cites it 2×
Roberson (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
Erdmann (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
Rucker (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2×
Martinez-torres (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 2× “Martinez-Torres argues that 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D)(lxviii) therefore is the applicable section and he is eligible to have ETCs applied.”
Diaz (W.D. Pa. 2025). · cites it 2×
Benji Macaulay v. B. Birkholz, Warden (C.D. Cal. 2025). · cites it 2×
McLemore (E.D. Ark. 2025). · cites it 2×
Justis (D. Maryland 2026). · cites it 2×
Sessum (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 2×
Cortez (D.S.D. 2026). · cites it 2×
Woods (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 2×
Crish (W.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 2×
Amalia Rebecca Gonzales v. Warden FCI Greenville (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 2×
Mathers (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 2×
Jells (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 2×
D’arius Akim Jackson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (D. Or. 2026). · cites it 2×
Beauchaine (W.D. Pa. 2026). · cites it 2×
Tovar (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 2×
Myers (M.D. Penn. 2026). · cites it 2×
Anthony Fortner v. B. Eischen, Warden (8th Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
Mayorga-Gonzalez (W.D. La. 2026). · cites it 2×
Kruchten (E.D. Mich. 2026). · cites it 2×
West (W.D. Tenn. 2026). · cites it 2×
Corbin (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 2×
Herrell (N.D. Ala. 2026). · cites it 2×
Johnston (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 2×
Juan Gabriel Barrios v. Acting Warden Bienemy (E.D. Va. 2026). · cites it 2×
Emmerich (E.D. Wis. 2026). · cites it 2×
Cobb (S.D. Ga. 2026). · cites it 2×
Herrera (S.D. Miss. 2026). · cites it 2×
Duke (S.D. Ill. 2026). · cites it 2×
Abbott (S.D. Miss. 2026). · cites it 2×
Coleman (E.D. Mo. 2026). · cites it 2×
Gonzalez-carmona (N.D. Fla. 2026). · cites it 2×
United States v. McKenzie (1st Cir. 2026). · cites it 2×
Carrera-Chavez (S.D. Miss. 2026). · cites it 2×
Fraser (E.D. Ark. 2026). · cites it 2×
Pittman (D. Minnesota 2026). · cites it 2×
Hiipakka (N.D. Ohio 2026). · cites it 2×
Sewell (W.D. Pa. 2026). · cites it 2×
Adrian Tiberiu Oprea, Plaintiff v. Warden, FCI Berlin, Defendant, 2023 DNH 075 (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 2×
Dione Taylor, Petitioner v. Warden, FCI Berlin, Respondent, 2023 DNH 073 (D.N.H. 2023). · cites it 2×
Warner v. United States (5th Cir. 2021).
Davis v. McConnell (5th Cir. 2021).
Crosby v. Warden Admax (10th Cir. 2022).
United States v. Edwards (D.D.C. 2022).
Setiyaningsih v. United States (10th Cir. 2022).
Sean Robinson v. (3rd Cir. 2023).
Martinez v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2023).
Acosta v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2023).
McAdams v. Yates (E.D. Ark. 2023).
(HC) Aranzubia v. Merlak (E.D. Cal. 2020).
(HC) Aranzubia v. Merlak (E.D. Cal. 2020).
(HC) Matecki v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Mulholland v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Sengchareun v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC)Smallwood v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Felix v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC)Jones v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Rabago v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Bohra v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
Glen Adkins v. Felicia Ponce (C.D. Cal. 2021).
(HC) Tran v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC)Rosales v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Harvey v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Alcaras v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Elder v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Santos v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2022).
(HC) Santos v. Thompson (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Moreno v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Valdez Mendez v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Hernandez-Cano v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Alvarez v. Arviza (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Meza v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2023).
(HC) Meza v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024).
(HC)Bautista v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024).
(HC) Fiorito v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2024).
Khouanmany v. Carvajal (N.D. Cal. 2021).
Lara v. Jusino (N.D. Cal. 2022).
Noe v. Matevousian (D. Colo. 2021).
Hurley v. Stover (D. Conn. 2024).
Faison v. Warden, FCC Coleman (M.D. Fla. 2023).
Harrison v. McGee (S.D. Fla. 2022).
Rolo v. Warden (S.D. Fla. 2024).
Yanagihara v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Untalan v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Caitano v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Estabilio v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Tong v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Aipoalani v. Derr (D. Haw. 2023).
Reynolds v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2022).
Haynes v. Williams (S.D. Ill. 2023).
Anderson v. Warden (S.D. Ind. 2022).
Mcneeley v. Rule (S.D. Ind. 2024).
Randolph v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2022).
Dahda v. Hudson (D. Kan. 2023).
Adkins v. Carter (D. Kan. 2024).
Linot v. United States (E.D. Ky. 2021).
Wheeler v. Joyner (E.D. Ky. 2021).
Maggio v. Joyner (E.D. Ky. 2021).
Jones v. LeMaster (E.D. Ky. 2023).
Clarke v. LeMaster (E.D. Ky. 2023).
Lesiak v. LeMasters (E.D. Ky. 2024).
Darling v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2023).
Walsh v. Boncher (D. Mass. 2023).
Knight v. Bell (D. Maryland 2021).
Benson v. Carter (D. Maryland 2024).
Buchanan v. Hemingway (E.D. Mich. 2022).
Peete v. United States (E.D. Mich. 2023).
Riesqo Penate v. Garland (W.D. Mich. 2023).
Pollock, Jr. v. Kallis (D. Minnesota 2021).
Depoister v. Birkholz (D. Minnesota 2021).
Henley v. Kallis (D. Minnesota 2021).
Rand v. Fikes (D. Minnesota 2021).
Vela v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023).
Valdez-Garcia v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023).
Chicoine v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023).
Stephenson v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023).
Jun v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2023).
Pesina v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023).
Simon v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2024).
Solberg v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Mctier v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2021).
Martin v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2023).
Shirley v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2022).
Garcia v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2023).
Padavona v. Ortiz (D.N.J. 2023).
Gerson v. Warden (D.N.J. 2023).
Cazarez v. Warden (D.N.J. 2023).
Posligua v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2024).
Diaz v. Warden (N.D.N.Y. 2021).
Frazer v. Petrucci (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
Reyes v. United States (S.D.N.Y. 2022).
Romero v. United States (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
Goggans v. Jamison (S.D.N.Y. 2023).
Urieta-Jaimes v. Jaimison (S.D.N.Y. 2024).
Nieves v. Warden, FCI Elkton (N.D. Ohio 2020).
Sanchez-Lara v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2023).
Griffiths v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2023).
Jones v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2023).
Tomlinson v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2023).
Prevatte v. Garza (N.D. Ohio 2024).
Yang v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (S.D. Ohio 2022). “Pursuant to 18 U. S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(ii), a prisoner with a minimum or low risk of recidivism "shall earn an additional 5 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence- based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
Goodwin v. Goldey (W.D. Okla. 2023).
Hanson v. Hendrix (D. Or. 2022).
Beltran v. Hendrix (D. Or. 2022).
Norton v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2023).
Limbaugh v. Jaquez (D. Or. 2023).
Konikow v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2023).
Russo v. Caravajal (E.D. Pa. 2022).
Dunston v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Monteiro v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Monteiro v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Bradley v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Gonzalez v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Liriano v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Guzman v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2021).
Laguerra v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2022).
Stepp v. Thompson, L.S.C.I. (M.D. Penn. 2022).
Goodman v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2022).
Pisman v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Dixon v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Gonzalez v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Lamar v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Gaye v. Thompson (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Bautista v. Spaulding (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Hamilton v. Jamison (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Yefferson v. Wertman (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Garcia v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Ruiz v. Barraza (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Larkin v. Baraza (M.D. Penn. 2023).
Gomez v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2024).
Cicchiello v. Peters (M.D. Penn. 2024).
Williams v. Sage (M.D. Penn. 2024).
Jordan v. Barves (M.D. Penn. 2024).
Maclloyd v. Trate (W.D. Pa. 2022).
Bard v. Queen (W.D. Pa. 2022). “Second, it is for the BOP in the first instance to determine if a course petitioner took after the effective date of the First Step Act, whether “Introduction to Fly Fishing,” or “History of Rock and Roll,” is an “evidence-based recidivism reduction program[] or productive…”
Ewell v. Carvajal (W.D. Pa. 2023).
Moore v. Hutchinson (W.D. Pa. 2023).
Barragan v. Knight (D.S.C. 2021).
Johnson v. Knight (D.S.C. 2021).
Oliver v. Barnes (D.S.C. 2021).
Oliver v. Barnes (D.S.C. 2021).
Amaro-Velazquez v. Knight (D.S.C. 2021).
Edwards v. Knight (D.S.C. 2022).
Villagomez v. Knight (D.S.C. 2022).
Lane v. Warden (D.S.C. 2022).
Pierre v. Joseph (D.S.C. 2023).
Farias-Cardenas v. Janson (D.S.C. 2024).
Andrews v. Jury (D.S.D. 2021).
Cornell v. Bennett (D.S.D. 2021).
Roberts v. Cox (D.S.D. 2022).
Korf v. Warden O'Donnell (D.S.D. 2024).
Dyer v. Fulgam (E.D. Tenn. 2021).
Kyger v. Williams (E.D. Tenn. 2024).
Brown v. Warden, FCI (W.D. Tenn. 2022).
Wilson v. Warden, FCI Beaumont (E.D. Tex. 2021).
Peters v. Warden, FCI Beaumont (E.D. Tex. 2021).
Martin v. Warden, FPC Beaumont (E.D. Tex. 2021).
Poirier v. Wilson (N.D. Tex. 2021).
Etti v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021).
Brooks v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021).
Norman v. Carr (N.D. Tex. 2021).
Fongers v. Garrett (E.D. Ark. 2024).
(HC) Rivera v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024).
Powell v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Powell v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Freeman v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024).
Woodley v. (lnu) (D. Kan. 2024).
Baker v. Lovett (E.D. Ky. 2024).
Mountz v. Carter (D. Maryland 2024).
Sharma v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Harper v. N'diaye (D.N.J. 2022).
Lewis v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2024).
Sauzo v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2024).
Posso v. Warden (D.N.J. 2024).
Pacheco v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2024).
Huynh v. Arviza (M.D. Penn. 2024).
Mojica-mendoza v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2024).
Mccormack v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2024).
Felton v. Warden Janson (D.S.C. 2024).
Brown v. O'Donnell (D.S.D. 2024).
Hamann v. Warden Mr. Smith (N.D. Tex. 2023).
Girven v. Smith (N.D. Tex. 2023).
Ali v. Peters (N.D. Tex. 2024).
Vargas v. Rivers (N.D. Tex. 2024).
Burruss v. Hawkins (S.D. Tex. 2023).
Dale v. Warden FPC Bryan (S.D. Tex. 2023).
Rudluff v. Rosalez (W.D. Tex. 2023).
Murph v. Andrews (E.D. Va. 2021).
Cooper v. United States (E.D. Va. 2021).
Dandridge v. United States (E.D. Va. 2023).
Francis v. Warden USP Lee (W.D. Va. 2023).
McKnight v. Streeval (W.D. Va. 2023).
Hudson v. Streeval (W.D. Va. 2024).
Sierra v. Jacquez (W.D. Wash. 2023).
Esparza v. United States (W.D. Wash. 2023).
Schmitt v. Barron (W.D. Wash. 2023).
Eytcheson v. Caternolo (W.D. Wash. 2024).
Johnson, Harry v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022).
Szafian, Stefan v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022).
Jones, Allen v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022).
Van, Lafayette v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2022).
Torres, Orlando v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023).
Nelson, Cortez v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023).
Chapman, Vernon v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023).
Chapman, Vernon v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023).
Broadnax, Eric v. Keyes, R.D. (W.D. Wis. 2023).
Rosa-Sanchez v. Ray (N.D.W. Va. 2024).
O'Hara v. Bayliss (N.D.W. Va. 2024).
Turner v. Young (S.D.W. Va 2023).
Gonzalez v. Rokosky (S.D.W. Va 2024).
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons (S.D.W. Va 2024).
Bellamy v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024). “§ 3624 (c)(2), qualify her for immediate transfer to pre- custody release.”
Ellis v. Warden (D. Kan. 2024).
Brewer v. Harrison (W.D. Tenn. 2024).
Silva v. Warden (S.D. Ind. 2024).
Gonzalez v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Anderson v. FPC Yankton (D.S.D. 2024).
Fortner v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Ways v. Allison (D. Neb. 2024).
Martin Calderon v. B. Birkholz (C.D. Cal. 2024).
Mason v. Bayless (N.D.W. Va. 2024).
Wyatt v. Jacquez (D. Or. 2024).
BabaFemi v. Baysore (S.D. Miss. 2024).
Sharma v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Williams v. Cohen (INMATE 1) (M.D. Ala. 2024).
Shay v. Rardin (D. Minnesota 2024).
Biggs v. King (D. Minnesota 2024).
Hernandez v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2024).
Phoummany v. United States (D. Minnesota 2024).
Feliz v. Martinez (W.D. La. 2024).
Ramsland v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2024).
Mejia v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2024).
Taylor v. Doe (E.D. Ark. 2024).
Darryl Tyler v. C. Garrett (8th Cir. 2024).
Maclloyd v. Trate (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Miller v. Warden (D. Conn. 2025).
Rangel, Oscar v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025).
Colotti v. Peters (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Banks, Karmit v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025).
(HC) Rivera v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2025).
Folk v. Barlet (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Kuzmenko v. Warden, FCI Waseca (D. Minnesota 2025).
Lykens v. Peters (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Perez v. Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025).
Anderson v. FPC Yankton (D.S.D. 2025).
Robinson v. Baysore (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Wall v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025).
(HC) Lopez-Cortez v. Salmonson (E.D. Cal. 2025).
Gough v. Unknown Party (D. Ariz. 2025).
Garza-Guerra v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Fleitas v. Rokosky (S.D.W. Va 2025).
Morales-Ramirez v. Arviza (9th Cir. 2025).
Arnold v. Entzel (E.D. Ky. 2025).
Hanson v. Drummond (W.D. La. 2025).
Letterlough v. Neely (N.D. Ala. 2025).
St. Remy v. Greene (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Maritza v. Neely (N.D. Ala. 2025).
(HC) Fiorito v. Brewer (E.D. Cal. 2025).
McClellon v. Peters (S.D.N.Y. 2025).
Brenneman v. Salmonson (E.D. Tex. 2025).
Cowette v. Puzio (D. Conn. 2025).
Esteban-Bravo v. Yazoo City USP (S.D. Miss. 2025).
United States v. Atif Malik (4th Cir. 2025).
Uhlenbrock v. Garrett (E.D. Ark. 2025).
Llanos-cortes v. Fci Loretto Warden (W.D. Pa. 2025). “One class of inmates not eligible to have their ETCs applied to their sentences is inmates subject to a final order of removal: the First Step Act provides at 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i) that “A prisoner is ineligible to apply time credits .”
Sanchez v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025).
Sarabia v. Warden FCI Sandstone (D. Minnesota 2025).
Haj v. LSCI-Allenwood Warden (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Dhar v. United States (D. Conn. 2025).
Casas v. Warden (D.N.J. 2025).
Kirk v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Sanchez v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025).
Salinas v. United States (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Gardley v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025).
Salinas v. United States (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Ortez v. F C I Oakdale II (W.D. La. 2025).
Glover v. Warden (S.D.N.Y. 2025).
James v. Goldey (W.D. Okla. 2025).
Joseph v. Saulsberry (N.D. Fla. 2025).
Vazquez v. Thompson (D.N.J. 2025).
George v. Baysore (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Ford v. Rickard (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Lopez-Campanella v. United States (D. Minnesota 2025).
Becerra Quinones v. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2025).
Pacheco Mejia v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025). “Those offenses are listed by reference to section, subsection, or in some cases paragraph within subsection, at 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D)(“A prisoner is ineligible to receive [ETC] .”
Doolin, Jerrod v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025).
Lofton v. Garza (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Hessiani v. Warden (W.D. La. 2025).
Voisine v. Warden (W.D. Okla. 2025).
Sanborn v. Warden Bowers (D. Mass. 2025).
Cajigas v. Warden (S.D.N.Y. 2025).
George v. Baysore (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Gardley v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025).
Kelly v. Acting Warden (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Hernandez-Jimenez v. Warden (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Bradford v. Peters (D. Ariz. 2025).
Brown v. Wingfield (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Cobb v. Birkholtz (D. Or. 2025).
Murdock, John v. Emmerich, E. (W.D. Wis. 2025).
Holland v. United States (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Maurice v. Wingfield (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Garcia-colorado v. Warden Thompson, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). “18 US.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)). The statute thus bars any inmate who is subject to a final order of removal from receiving FSA credits or applying any previously earned credits towards early supervised release, See, e.”
Pampkin v. United States (E.D. Mo. 2025).
Teed v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Booker v. Greenville FCI (S.D. Ill. 2025).
Payne v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2025).
Hutson v. Pistro (N.D. Fla. 2025).
Marcial v. Rule (D.N.M. 2025).
Marcial v. Rule (N.D. Tex. 2025).
Alford v. Wingfield (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Hirsch v. Fed. Prison Camp (D. Minnesota 2025).
Snider v. Bowers (D. Mass. 2025).
Johnston v. Gutierrez (D. Ariz. 2025).
Martinez v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025).
Gallop v. Bureau of Prisons (D. Minnesota 2025).
Dempster v. FCI Sheridan (D. Or. 2025).
Long v. Warden, FCI Elkton (N.D. Ohio 2025).
Ramos-Jose v. United States (D. Minnesota 2025).
Varner v. Gabby (N.D. Fla. 2025).
Sanderson v. Warden Sage (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Sandlain v. Warden (S.D.W. Va 2025).
Smith v. Warden FPC Schuylkill (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Gonzalez-Alvarado v. Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025).
Montano v. Peters (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Orobio-estacio v. Ice (W.D. Pa. 2025). “At 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i), the FSA makes an individual ineligible to have earned time credit applied if he or she is the “subject of a final order of removal under any provision of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and…”
Fisher v. Swaney (S.D. Ga. 2025).
McRand v. Wingfield (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Lang v. Rule (5th Cir. 2025).
Pena-Garcia v. Childress (S.D. Miss. 2025).
United States v. Sablan (9th Cir. 2025).
Gunther (D. Ariz. 2025).
Sanchez (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Entzel (E.D. Ky. 2025).
Taylor (S.D. Miss. 2025).
Cross (D. Minnesota 2025).
Anuebunwa (D. Conn. 2025).
Patel (D. Conn. 2025).
Miner (D. Ariz. 2025).
Mirabal-Parrales (W.D. Tex. 2025).
Gatson (D. Maryland 2025).
Duroseau (M.D. Penn. 2025).
Wright (W.D. La. 2025).
Crosby v. Warden ADX (10th Cir. 2025).
Darragh (M.D. Fla. 2025).
Nettles (E.D. Ky. 2025).
Montes (D. Kan. 2025).
Obi (W.D. Pa. 2025).
Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025).
United States v. Bland (2d Cir. 2025).
Gonzalez (D. Minnesota 2025).
Wilson (E.D. Mich. 2026).
Hassan v. Wingfield (9th Cir. 2026).
Petersen (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Wilburn (D.N.J. 2026).
Puckett (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Zamora (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Abbott (E.D. Mich. 2026).
Juarez (W.D. Tenn. 2026).
Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Desouza (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Garg (M.D. Penn. 2026).
Mairs (D. Minnesota 2025).
Freeman (S.D. Ill. 2026).
United States v. Bland (2d Cir. 2026).
Peralta-Castro (N.D. Ohio 2026).
Ladua v. Gunther (9th Cir. 2026).
Varela (W.D. Tenn. 2026).
Satizabal (E.D. Ark. 2026).
Cisneros-Flores v. Warden (9th Cir. 2026).
Haynes (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Cole (S.D. Tex. 2026).
Messer (D. Or. 2026).
Ramirez (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Champion-Cain (C.D. Ill. 2026).
Cruz (W.D. Tenn. 2026).
Quamey (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Hagen (S.D. Tex. 2026).
Salazar (S.D.W. Va 2026).
Cloud (S.D.W. Va 2026).
Healy (N.D. Ohio 2026).
Mizori (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Peters (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Peters (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Carter (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Markwith (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Bradley (D. Maryland 2026).
Tomlinson (N.D. Ohio 2026).
Reese (D. Minnesota 2026).
Grundman (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Bartoli (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Delavan (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Singh (W.D. Pa. 2026).
Beato-Estrella (M.D. Penn. 2026).
Bachman (D. Conn. 2026).
Khan (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Valdovinos-Perez (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Martinez (W.D. La. 2026).
Robinson (E.D. Ky. 2026).
Hicks (S.D. Ill. 2026).
Toney (W.D. Tenn. 2026).
Stevenson (D. Minnesota 2026).
Clayburn (D. Ariz. 2026).
Kvashuk (S.D. Ga. 2026).
Ramos-Cruz (S.D. Miss. 2026).
Westbrook (E.D. Va. 2026).
Jesus Garcia v. E. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2026). “But, under “18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(B), a prisoner is explicitly barred from earning credits .”
Richards (E.D. Ky. 2026).
Piner (E.D. Ky. 2026).
United States of Am. v. P Joshua Fields, 2021 DNH 120 (D.N.H. 2023).
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(a) — 1 case
Martinez v. Rosalez (W.D. Tex. 2023). “”18 U.S.C. § 3632(a). Second, the BOP was required to “implement and complete the initial intake risk and needs assessment for each prisoner.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(a)(3) — 1 case
Bard v. Queen (W.D. Pa. 2022). “Second, it is for the BOP in the first instance to determine if a course petitioner took after the effective date of the First Step Act, whether “Introduction to Fly Fishing,” or “History of Rock and Roll,” is an “evidence-based recidivism reduction program[] or productive…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d) — 2 cases
Whitaker v. Cox (D.S.D. 2021). ““who successfully completes evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
Patel v. Barron (W.D. Wash. 2023). “18 U.S.C § 3632(d). One such incentive was the awarding of “time credits” to “be applied toward time in 11 prerelease custody or supervised release” upon eligible inmates’ successful completion of anti-recidivism programming.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4) — 3 cases
Griffis v. Segal (D. Minnesota 2023). “) Griffis acknowledges that she is a medium recidivism risk level but argues that she is entitled to the application of earned time credits under the FSA regardless of her recidivism risk level. (Id.”
Bellamy v. Lillard (S.D. Ill. 2024). “§ 3624 (c)(2), qualify her for immediate transfer to pre- custody release.”
Garcia v. Eischen (D. Minnesota 2025). “See18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4). The BOP applied 365 days of FSA time credits to his sentence toward early release.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A) — 3 cases
Negron-Soto v. Knight (D.S.C. 2023). “As to the merits of the petition: Petitioner asserts that he earned time credits per the First Step Act, 18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A). ECF No. 1 at 2.”
Howell v. Napier (D.S.C. 2025). “See 18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A). However, an inmate may not earn FSA credits if they are serving a sentence for any of the 72 disqualifying offenses specified in 18 U.”
Thomas v. Hudson (D. Ariz. 2025). “18 U.S.C § 3632(d)(4)(A)-(C). Prisoners are ineligible to receive time 14 credits if they are serving a sentence for a conviction listed in 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A)(i) — 1 case
Hoss v. Warden (D. Maryland 2022). “Hoss explains that under Title “18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(A)(i) a prisoner is entitled to earn 10 days of FTC for every 30 days of successful evidence-based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(B) — 1 case
Jesus Garcia v. E. Emmerich (W.D. Wis. 2026). “But, under “18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(B), a prisoner is explicitly barred from earning credits .”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(C) — 7 cases
(HC) Iqbal v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024).
(HC) Ramos v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). “As set forth above, 21 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
(HC)Perez-Valencia v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). “As set forth above, 16 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
(HC) Briones-Pereyra v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). “As set forth above, under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime 11 credits earned .”
(HC) Pina v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota (E.D. Cal. 2024). “) 6 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
(HC) Arellano-Cigfuego v. Warden (E.D. Cal. 2024). “As set forth above, 15 under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(C), “[t]ime credits earned .”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(D) — 3 cases
Sosonko v. Peters (W.D. Pa. 2025). “And under 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D), a prisoner is ineligible to receive earned time credit if he is serving a sentence for a conviction under any section of chapter 55, related to kidnapping.”
Pacheco Mejia v. Underwood (W.D. Pa. 2025). “Those offenses are listed by reference to section, subsection, or in some cases paragraph within subsection, at 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D)(“A prisoner is ineligible to receive [ETC] .”
Martinez-torres (W.D. Pa. 2025). “Martinez-Torres argues that 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(D)(lxviii) therefore is the applicable section and he is eligible to have ETCs applied.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E) — 2 cases
Hassan v. Warden Hijar (W.D. Tex. 2023). “His petition is denied because it appears from its face and the attached exhibits that he is not entitled to § 2241 relief.”
Garcia-colorado v. Warden Thompson, Fci Fort Dix (D.N.J. 2025). “18 US.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)). The statute thus bars any inmate who is subject to a final order of removal from receiving FSA credits or applying any previously earned credits towards early supervised release, See, e.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)(i) — 5 cases
Cheng v. United States (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “§ 701 , et seq., and the Federal Tort Claims Act (the “FTCA”), 28 U.”
Herrera v. Rardin (E.D. Mich. 2024). “” 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). Petitioner does not have any liberty interest in receiving his FSA credits, thus, his due process claim is without merit.”
Cargill v. Warden Healy (N.D. Ohio 2025). “” 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i). On January 19, 2009, DHS issued a Notice and Order of Expedited Removal (“NOER”) under § 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) against Petitioner deeming him inadmissible to the United States under § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) of the INA (the…”
Llanos-cortes v. Fci Loretto Warden (W.D. Pa. 2025). “One class of inmates not eligible to have their ETCs applied to their sentences is inmates subject to a final order of removal: the First Step Act provides at 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i) that “A prisoner is ineligible to apply time credits .”
Orobio-estacio v. Ice (W.D. Pa. 2025). “At 18 U.S.C.§ 3632(d)(4)(E)(i), the FSA makes an individual ineligible to have earned time credit applied if he or she is the “subject of a final order of removal under any provision of the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(ii) — 1 case
Yang v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons (S.D. Ohio 2022). “Pursuant to 18 U. S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(ii), a prisoner with a minimum or low risk of recidivism "shall earn an additional 5 days of time credits for every 30 days of successful participation in evidence- based recidivism reduction programming or productive activities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.