19 U.S.C. § 1585
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, § 690(b)(10), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2223
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1931–1978 · leading case: United States v. One (1) 1963, Hatteras Yacht Ann Marie A/K/A Shasta Ii, Etc., 584 F.2d 72 (5th Cir. 1978).
United States v. One (1) 1963, Hatteras Yacht Ann Marie A/K/A Shasta Ii, Etc., 584 F.2d 72 (5th Cir. 1978). “*74 RONEY, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from the judgment of a district court sustaining forfeiture of a Hatteras yacht, the ANN MARIE, by the United States government pursuant to 19 U.S.C.A. § 1585 . The district court found that defendant vessel had arrived from a foreign…”
The Mazel Tov, 51 F.2d 292 (D.R.I. 1931). “The first two causes are laid as violations of section 584 (19 USCA § 1584), and the third as a violation of section 585 (19 USCA § 1585). No forfeiture of either cargo or vessel is asked.”
The Which One, 2 F. Supp. 890 (E.D.N.Y 1933). “Johns, Newfoundland, and attempted to depart without just cause and without making a report as required by the Tariff Act, § 585 (title 19 U. S. C. § 1585 [19 USCA § 1585]). The last cause of action, the fourth, sets forth that those in charge of the vessel fraudulently and…”
United States v. Cook, 56 F.2d 921 (1st Cir. 1932). “The first two grounds are alleged to be violations of section 584 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1584), and the third a violation of section 585 of that act (19 USCA § 1585). The second is a libel seeking the forfeiture of the cargo (403 sacks and 6 bottles of distilled…”
The Yulu, 4 F. Supp. 74 (S.D. Ala. 1933). “She was then arrested and brought to Mobile, where she was libeled by the government for violation of the custom’s act (19 USCA § 1585). A motion to dismiss was filed to the libel on various grounds; only two of them, however, need to be noted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.