19 U.S.C. § 1592

Penalties for fraud, gross negligence, and negligence

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Prohibition(1) General ruleWithout regard to whether the United States is or may be deprived of all or a portion of any lawful duty, tax, or fee thereby, no person, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence—(A) may enter, introduce, or attempt to enter or introduce any merchandise into the commerce of the United States by means of—(i) any document or electronically transmitted data or information, written or oral statement, or act which is material and false, or(ii) any omission which is material, or(B) may aid or abet any other person to violate subparagraph (A).(2) Exception

Clerical errors or mistakes of fact are not violations of paragraph (1) unless they are part of a pattern of negligent conduct. The mere nonintentional repetition by an electronic system of an initial clerical error does not constitute a pattern of negligent conduct.

(b) Procedures(1) Pre-penalty notice(A) In generalIf the Customs Service has reasonable cause to believe that there has been a violation of subsection (a) and determines that further proceedings are warranted, it shall issue to the person concerned a written notice of its intention to issue a claim for a monetary penalty. Such notice shall—(i) describe the merchandise;(ii) set forth the details of the entry or introduction, the attempted entry or introduction, or the aiding or procuring of the entry or introduction;(iii) specify all laws and regulations allegedly violated;(iv) disclose all the material facts which establish the alleged violation;(v) state whether the alleged violation occurred as a result of fraud, gross negligence, or negligence;(vi) state the estimated loss of lawful duties, taxes, and fees, if any, and, taking into account all circumstances, the amount of the proposed monetary penalty; and(vii) inform such person that he shall have a reasonable opportunity to make representations, both oral and written, as to why a claim for a monetary penalty should not be issued in the amount stated.(B) ExceptionsThe preceding subparagraph shall not apply if—(i) the importation with respect to which the violation of subsection (a) occurs is noncommercial in nature, or(ii) the amount of the penalty in the penalty claim issued under paragraph (2) is $1,000 or less.(2) Penalty claim

After considering representations, if any, made by the person concerned pursuant to the notice issued under paragraph (1), the Customs Service shall determine whether any violation of subsection (a), as alleged in the notice, has occurred. If the Customs Service determines that there was no violation, it shall promptly issue a written statement of the determination to the person to whom the notice was sent. If the Customs Service determines that there was a violation, it shall issue a written penalty claim to such person. The written penalty claim shall specify all changes in the information provided under clauses (i) through (vi) of paragraph (1)(A). Such person shall have a reasonable opportunity under section 1618 of this title to make representations, both oral and written, seeking remission or mitigation of the monetary penalty. At the conclusion of any proceeding under such section 1618, the Customs Service shall provide to the person concerned a written statement which sets forth the final determination and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which such determination is based.

A fraudulent violation of subsection (a) is punishable by a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed the domestic value of the merchandise.

(2) Gross negligenceA grossly negligent violation of subsection (a) is punishable by a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed—(A) the lesser of—(i) the domestic value of the merchandise, or(ii) four times the lawful duties, taxes, and fees of which the United States is or may be deprived, or(B) if the violation did not affect the assessment of duties, 40 percent of the dutiable value of the merchandise.(3) NegligenceA negligent violation of subsection (a) is punishable by a civil penalty in an amount not to exceed—(A) the lesser of—(i) the domestic value of the merchandise, or(ii) two times the lawful duties, taxes, and fees of which the United States is or may be deprived, or(B) if the violation did not affect the assessment of duties, 20 percent of the dutiable value of the merchandise.(4) Prior disclosureIf the person concerned discloses the circumstances of a violation of subsection (a) before, or without knowledge of, the commencement of a formal investigation of such violation, with respect to such violation, merchandise shall not be seized and any monetary penalty to be assessed under subsection (c) shall not exceed—(A) if the violation resulted from fraud—(i) an amount equal to 100 percent of the lawful duties, taxes, and fees of which the United States is or may be deprived, so long as such person tenders the unpaid amount of the lawful duties, taxes, and fees at the time of disclosure, or within 30 days (or such longer period as the Customs Service may provide) after notice by the Customs Service of its calculation of such unpaid amount, or(ii) if such violation did not affect the assessment of duties, 10 percent of the dutiable value; or(B) if such violation resulted from negligence or gross negligence, the interest (computed from the date of liquidation at the prevailing rate of interest applied under section 6621 of title 26) on the amount of lawful duties, taxes, and fees of which the United States is or may be deprived so long as such person tenders the unpaid amount of the lawful duties, taxes, and fees at the time of disclosure, or within 30 days (or such longer period as the Customs Service may provide) after notice by the Customs Service of its calculation of such unpaid amount.The person asserting lack of knowledge of the commencement of a formal investigation has the burden of proof in establishing such lack of knowledge. For purposes of this section, a formal investigation of a violation is considered to be commenced with regard to the disclosing party and the disclosed information on the date recorded in writing by the Customs Service as the date on which facts and circumstances were discovered or information was received which caused the Customs Service to believe that a possibility of a violation of subsection (a) existed.(5) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the USMCA

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 4531 of this title if the importer, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing with respect to that good.

(6) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 202 of the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing.

(7) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement(A) An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 202 of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, voluntarily and promptly makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing.(B) In the regulations referred to in subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to prescribe time periods for making a corrected declaration and paying duties owing under subparagraph (A), if such periods are not shorter than 1 year following the date on which the importer makes the incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good.(8) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States-Australia free trade agreement(A) In general

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 203 of the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, voluntarily and promptly makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing.

(B) Time periods for making corrections

In the regulations referred to in subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to prescribe time periods for making a corrected declaration and paying duties owing under subparagraph (A), if such periods are not shorter than 1 year following the date on which the importer makes the incorrect claim.

(9) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 4033 of this title if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly and voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing.

(10) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 203 of the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly and voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing with respect to that good.

(11) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 202 of the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly and voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing with respect to that good.

(12) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 203 of the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly and voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing with respect to that good.

(13) Prior disclosure regarding claims under the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement

An importer shall not be subject to penalties under subsection (a) for making an incorrect claim that a good qualifies as an originating good under section 203 of the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act if the importer, in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, promptly and voluntarily makes a corrected declaration and pays any duties owing with respect to that good.

(14) Seizure

If the Secretary has reasonable cause to believe that a person has violated the provisions of subsection (a) and that such person is insolvent or beyond the jurisdiction of the United States or that seizure is otherwise essential to protect the revenue of the United States or to prevent the introduction of prohibited or restricted merchandise into the customs territory of the United States, then such merchandise may be seized and, upon assessment of a monetary penalty, forfeited unless the monetary penalty is paid within the time specified by law. Within a reasonable time after any such seizure is made, the Secretary shall issue to the person concerned a written statement containing the reasons for the seizure. After seizure of merchandise under this subsection, the Secretary may, in the case of restricted merchandise, and shall, in the case of any other merchandise (other than prohibited merchandise), return such merchandise upon the deposit of security not to exceed the maximum monetary penalty which may be assessed under subsection (c).

(d) Deprivation of lawful duties, taxes, or fees

Notwithstanding section 1514 of this title, if the United States has been deprived of lawful duties, taxes, or fees as a result of a violation of subsection (a), the Customs Service shall require that such lawful duties, taxes, and fees be restored, whether or not a monetary penalty is assessed.

(e) Court of International Trade proceedingsNotwithstanding any other provision of law, in any proceeding commenced by the United States in the Court of International Trade for the recovery of any monetary penalty claimed under this section—(1) all issues, including the amount of the penalty, shall be tried de novo;(2) if the monetary penalty is based on fraud, the United States shall have the burden of proof to establish the alleged violation by clear and convincing evidence;(3) if the monetary penalty is based on gross negligence, the United States shall have the burden of proof to establish all the elements of the alleged violation; and(4) if the monetary penalty is based on negligence, the United States shall have the burden of proof to establish the act or omission constituting the violation, and the alleged violator shall have the burden of proof that the act or omission did not occur as a result of negligence.(f) False certifications of origin under the USMCA(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a USMCA certification of origin (as such term is defined in section 1508 of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin provided for in section 4531 of this title. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a USMCA certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person shall not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a USMCA certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(g) False certifications of origin under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a Chile FTA Certificate of Origin (as defined in section 1508(f)(1)(B) of this title 11 So in original. Probably should be followed by a closing parenthesis. that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin set out in section 202 of the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Immediate and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, immediately after an exporter or producer that issued a Chile FTA Certificate of Origin has reason to believe that such certificate contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certificate was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person may not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a Chile FTA Certificate of Origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person immediately and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certificate.(h) False certifications of origin under the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a CAFTA–DR certification of origin (as defined in section 1508(g)(1)(B) of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin set out in section 4033 of this title. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a CAFTA–DR certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person may not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a CAFTA–DR certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(i) False certifications of origin under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a PTPA certification of origin (as defined in section 1508(h)(1)(B) of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin provided for in section 203 of the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a PTPA certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person shall not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a PTPA certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(j) False certifications of origin under the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a KFTA certification of origin (as defined in section 1508 of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin provided for in section 202 of the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a KFTA certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person shall not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a KFTA certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(k) False certifications of origin under the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a CTPA certification of origin (as defined in section 1508 of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin provided for in section 203 of the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a CTPA certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person shall not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a CTPA certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(l) False certifications of origin under the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement(1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), it is unlawful for any person to certify falsely, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence, in a Panama TPA certification of origin (as defined in section 1508 of this title) that a good exported from the United States qualifies as an originating good under the rules of origin provided for in section 203 of the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act. The procedures and penalties of this section that apply to a violation of subsection (a) also apply to a violation of this subsection.

(2) Prompt and voluntary disclosure of incorrect information

No penalty shall be imposed under this subsection if, promptly after an exporter or producer that issued a Panama TPA certification of origin has reason to believe that such certification contains or is based on incorrect information, the exporter or producer voluntarily provides written notice of such incorrect information to every person to whom the certification was issued.

(3) ExceptionA person shall not be considered to have violated paragraph (1) if—(A) the information was correct at the time it was provided in a Panama TPA certification of origin but was later rendered incorrect due to a change in circumstances; and(B) the person promptly and voluntarily provides written notice of the change in circumstances to all persons to whom the person provided the certification.(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 592, 46 Stat. 750; Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title III, § 304(b), 49 Stat. 527; Pub. L. 95–410, title I, § 110(a), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 96–417, title VI, § 609, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1746; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 103–182, title II, § 205(c), title VI, § 621, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2095, 2180; Pub. L. 104–295, §§ 3(a)(4), (5), 21(e)(12), (13), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3515, 3531; Pub. L. 106–36, title I, § 1001(b)(8), June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 132; Pub. L. 108–77, title II, § 205(a), Sept. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 108–78, title II, § 204, Sept. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 961; Pub. L. 108–286, title II, § 205, Aug. 3, 2004, 118 Stat. 939; Pub. L. 109–53, title II, § 206(a), Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 484; Pub. L. 110–138, title II, § 205(a), Dec. 14, 2007, 121 Stat. 1475; Pub. L. 112–41, title II, § 204(a), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 448; Pub. L. 112–42, title II, § 205(a), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 483; Pub. L. 112–43, title II, § 205(a), Oct. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 518; Pub. L. 116–113, title II, § 204(a), Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 44.)Amendment of Section

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 112–43, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 112–42, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 112–41, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 110–138, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2007 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(d) of Pub. L. 109–53, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2005 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 106(c) of Pub. L. 108–286, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2004 Amendment note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 108–78, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

For termination of amendment by section 107(c) of Pub. L. 108–77, see Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 202 of the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsecs. (c)(6) and (g)(1), is section 202 of Pub. L. 108–77, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 202 of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(7)(A), is section 202 of Pub. L. 108–78, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 203 of the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsec. (c)(8)(A), is section 203 of Pub. L. 108–286, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 203 of the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsecs. (c)(10) and (i)(1), is section 203 of Pub. L. 110–138, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 202 of the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsecs. (c)(11) and (j)(1), is section 202 of Pub. L. 112–41, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 203 of the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsecs. (c)(12) and (k)(1), is section 203 of Pub. L. 112–42, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Section 203 of the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act, referred to in subsecs. (c)(13) and (l)(1), is section 203 of Pub. L. 112–43, which is set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, § III, H, 38 Stat. 183, which was superseded by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 592, 42 Stat. 982, and was repealed by section 643 thereof. Section 592 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 592 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

The provisions of section III, H, of the 1913 act were substituted for provisions of the same nature made by the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, §§ 6, 9, 26 Stat. 134, 135, amended and reenacted by Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 95, 97.

Those provisions superseded similar provisions made by R.S. § 2864, as amended by act Feb. 18, 1875, ch. 80, 18 Stat. 319, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642, 42 Stat. 989.

R.S. § 2839 provided for forfeiture of merchandise entered, but not invoiced according to the actual cost at the place of exportation, with the design to evade payment of duty. It was repealed by the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141, and provisions of a similar nature were made by section 9 of that act, amended by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 97, and further amended by the Underwood Tariff Act of Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, § III, H, 38 Stat. 183.

Act June 22, 1874, ch. 391, § 16, 18 Stat. 189, required special findings as to fraud in actions, etc., to enforce forfeitures, etc., prior to repeal by Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141.

Amendments

2020—Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 116–113, § 204(a)(1), added par. (5) and struck out former par. (5) which related to prior disclosure regarding NAFTA claims.

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 116–113, § 204(a)(2), added subsec. (f) and struck out former subsec. (f) which related to false certifications regarding exports to NAFTA countries.

2011—Subsec. (c)(11). Pub. L. 112–41, §§ 107(c), 204(a)(1)(B), temporarily added par. (11). Former par. (11) redesignated (12). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (c)(12). Pub. L. 112–42, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(B), temporarily added par. (12). Former par. (12) redesignated (13). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 112–41, §§ 107(c), 204(a)(1)(A), temporarily redesignated par. (11) as (12). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (c)(13). Pub. L. 112–43, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(B), temporarily added par. (13). Former par. (13) redesignated (14). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 112–42, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(A), temporarily redesignated par. (12) as (13). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (c)(14). Pub. L. 112–43, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(A), temporarily redesignated par. (13) as (14). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (j). Pub. L. 112–41, §§ 107(c), 204(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (j). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 112–42, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (k). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (l). Pub. L. 112–43, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (l). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment note below.

2007—Subsec. (c)(10), (11). Pub. L. 110–138, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1), temporarily added par. (10) and redesignated former par. (10) as (11). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2007 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 110–138, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (i). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2007 Amendment note below.

2005—Subsec. (c)(9), (10). Pub. L. 109–53, §§ 107(d), 206(a)(1), temporarily added par. (9) and redesignated former par. (9) as (10). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2005 Amendment note below.

Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 109–53, §§ 107(d), 206(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (h). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2005 Amendment note below.

2004—Subsec. (c)(8), (9). Pub. L. 108–286, §§ 106(c), 205, temporarily added par. (8) and redesignated former par. (8) as (9). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2004 Amendment note below.

2003—Subsec. (c)(6). Pub. L. 108–77, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(B), temporarily added par. (6). Former par. (6) redesignated (7). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

Subsec. (c)(7). Pub. L. 108–78, §§ 107(c), 204(2), temporarily added par. (7). Former par. (7) redesignated (8). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

Pub. L. 108–77, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(1)(A), temporarily redesignated par. (6) as (7). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

Subsec. (c)(8). Pub. L. 108–78, §§ 107(c), 204(1), temporarily redesignated par. (7) as (8). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 108–77, §§ 107(c), 205(a)(2), temporarily added subsec. (g). See Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments note below.

1999—Subsec. (c)(4)(A)(i), (B). Pub. L. 106–36 amended Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(4)(A). See 1993 Amendment notes below.

1996—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 104–295, § 3(a)(4)(A), substituted “lawful duty, tax, or fee” for “lawful duty”.

Subsecs. (b)(1)(A)(vi), (c)(2)(A)(ii), (3)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 104–295, § 3(a)(4)(B), substituted “lawful duties, taxes, and fees” for “lawful duties”.

Subsec. (c)(4)(A)(i), (B). Pub. L. 104–295, § 21(e)(12), amended Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(4)(A). See 1993 Amendment notes below.

Pub. L. 104–295, § 3(a)(4)(B), substituted “lawful duties, taxes, and fees” for “lawful duties” in two places.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 104–295, § 21(e)(13), inserted comma after “taxes” in heading.

Pub. L. 104–295, § 3(a)(5), substituted “and fees be restored” for “or fees be restored”.

1993—Subsec. (a)(1)(A)(i). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(1), inserted “or electronically transmitted data or information” after “document”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(2), inserted at end “The mere nonintentional repetition by an electronic system of an initial clerical error does not constitute a pattern of negligent conduct.”

Subsec. (b)(1)(A). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(3)(A), substituted “the Customs Service” for “the appropriate customs officer”, “it shall issue” for “he shall issue” and “its intention” for “his intention” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(3)(B), substituted “the Customs Service shall determine” for “the appropriate customs officer shall determine”, “the Customs Service determines” for “such officer determines” in two places, “it shall” for “he shall” in two places, and “the Customs Service shall provide” for “the appropriate customs officer shall provide”.

Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(4)(B), inserted at end “For purposes of this section, a formal investigation of a violation is considered to be commenced with regard to the disclosing party and the disclosed information on the date recorded in writing by the Customs Service as the date on which facts and circumstances were discovered or information was received which caused the Customs Service to believe that a possibility of a violation of subsection (a) existed.”

Subsec. (c)(4)(A)(i). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(4)(A), as amended by Pub. L. 104–295, § 21(e)(12); Pub. L. 106–36, § 1001(b)(8), substituted “time of disclosure, or within 30 days (or such longer period as the Customs Service may provide) after notice by the Customs Service of its” for “time of disclosure or within thirty days, or such longer period as the appropriate customs officer may provide, after notice by the appropriate customs officer of his”.

Subsec. (c)(4)(B). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(4)(A), as amended by Pub. L. 104–295, § 21(e)(12); Pub. L. 106–36, § 1001(b)(8), which directed the substitution of “time of disclosure, or within 30 days (or such longer period as the Customs Service may provide) after notice by the Customs Service of its” for “time of disclosure, or within 30 days, or such longer period as the appropriate customs officer may provide, after notice by the appropriate customs officer of his”, was executed by making the substitution for text which began “time of disclosure or within 30 days”, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Subsec. (c)(5), (6). Pub. L. 103–182, § 205(c)(1), added par. (5) and redesignated former par. (5) as (6).

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 103–182, § 621(5), inserted “, taxes or fees” after “duties” in heading and in text substituted “duties, taxes, or fees” for “duties” in two places and “the Customs Service” for “the appropriate customs officer”.

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 103–182, § 205(c)(2), added subsec. (f).

1986—Subsec. (c)(4)(B). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” for “Internal Revenue Code of 1954”, which for purposes of codification was translated as “title 26” thus requiring no change in text.

1980—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 96–417 substituted in heading “Court of International Trade” for “District court” and in text “proceeding commenced by the United States in the Court of International Trade” for “proceeding in a United States district court commenced by the United States pursuant to section 1604 of this title”.

1978—Pub. L. 95–410 substituted subsecs. (a) to (e) relating to penalties for fraud, gross negligence, and negligence for prior provisions which: provided for forfeiture of merchandise, or recovery of value thereof, where entry or attempted entry of the merchandise was made using fraudulent or false invoice, declaration, affidavit, letter, paper, or false statement, written or verbal, false or fraudulent practice or appliance, or false statement in a declaration on entry without reasonable cause to believe the truth of the statement or aided or procured the making any such false statement as to any material matter without reasonable cause to believe the truth of the statement, regardless of deprivation of lawful duties, or guilty of any willful act or omission when there was a deprivation of such duties; made the forfeiture applicable to the whole of the merchandise or the value thereof where package contained the particular articles to which the fraud or false paper or statement related; and defined attempt to enter the merchandise without an actual entry having been made or offered.

1935—Act Aug. 5, 1935, inserted “whether or not the United States shall or may be deprived of the lawful duties, or any portion thereof, accruing upon the merchandise, or any portion thereof, embraced or referred to in such invoice, declaration, affidavit, letter, paper, or statement;”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2020 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020) and applicable with respect to goods entered or exported from the United States on or after that date, see section 204(c) of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under section 1514 of this title.

Effective and Termination Dates of 2011 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–43 effective Oct. 21, 2011, applicable with respect to Panama on the date the United States–Panama Trade Promotion Agreement enters into force (Oct. 31, 2012), and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement terminates, see section 107(b), (c) of Pub. L. 112–43, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–42 effective Oct. 21, 2011, applicable with respect to Colombia on the date the United States–Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement enters into force (May 15, 2012), and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement terminates, see section 107(b), (c) of Pub. L. 112–42, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–41 effective Oct. 21, 2011, applicable with respect to Korea on the date the United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 15, 2012), and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement terminates, see section 107(b), (c) of Pub. L. 112–41, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Effective and Termination Dates of 2007 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–138 effective on the date the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement enters into force (Feb. 1, 2009) and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 107(a), (c) of Pub. L. 110–138, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Effective and Termination Dates of 2005 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 109–53 effective on the date the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Mar. 1, 2006) and to cease to have effect on date Agreement ceases to be in force with respect to the United States, and, during any period in which a country ceases to be a CAFTA–DR country, to cease to have effect with respect to such country, see section 107 of Pub. L. 109–53, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates note under section 4001 of this title.

Effective and Termination Dates of 2004 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–286 effective on the date on which the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Jan. 1, 2005) and to cease to be effective on the date on which the Agreement terminates, see section 106(a), (c) of Pub. L. 108–286, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Effective and Termination Dates of 2003 Amendments

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–78 effective on the date the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Jan. 1, 2004), and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 107(a), (c) of Pub. L. 108–78, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Amendment by Pub. L. 108–77 effective on the date the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement enters into force (Jan. 1, 2004), and to cease to be effective on the date the Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 107(a), (c) of Pub. L. 108–77, set out in a note under section 3805 of this title.

Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by section 3(a)(4), (5) of Pub. L. 104–295 applicable as of Dec. 8, 1993, see section 3(b) of Pub. L. 104–295, set out as a note under section 1321 of this title.

Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by section 205(c) of Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1994), see section 213(b) of Pub. L. 103–182, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under former section 3331 of this title.

Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(2) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–410, title I, § 110(f), Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 897, provided that:“(1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), subsections (a), (b), and (c) (other than new subsection (e) of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as added by subsection (a)) [subsecs. (a), (b), and (c), not including (e) of this section] shall be effective with respect to proceedings commenced after the 89th day after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 3, 1978].“(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [this section] (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) [Oct. 3, 1978] shall apply to any alleged intentional violation thereof involving television receivers that are the product of Japan and that were or are the subject of antidumping proceedings if the alleged intentional violation—“(i) occurred before the date of enactment of this Act, and“(ii) was the subject of an investigation by the Customs Service which was begun before the date of enactment of this Act.“(C) Except as provided in the next sentence, subsection (e) of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as added by subsection (a)) [subsec. (e) of this section] shall be effective on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 3, 1978]. Notwithstanding any provision of law, in any proceeding in a United States district court commenced by the United States pursuant to section 604 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [section 1604 of this title] for the recovery of any monetary penalty claimed under section 592 of such Act [this section] for an alleged intentional violation described in subparagraph (B)—“(i) all issues, including the amount of the penalty, shall be tried de novo; and“(ii) the United States shall have the burden of proof to establish such violation by a preponderance of the evidence.“(2)(A) The amendment made by subsection (e) [to section 1621 of this title] shall apply with respect to alleged violations of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [this section] resulting from gross negligence or negligence which are committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 3, 1978].“(B) In the case of any alleged violation of such section 592 [this section] resulting from gross negligence or negligence which was committed before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 3, 1978] and for which no suit or action for recovery was commenced before such date of enactment, no suit or action for recovery with respect to such alleged violation shall be instituted after—“(i) the closing date of the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the alleged violation was committed, or“(ii) the closing date of the 2-year period beginning on such date of enactment,whichever date later occurs, except that no such suit or action may be instituted after the date on which such suit or action would have been barred under section 621 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [section 1621 of this title] (as in effect on the day before such date of enactment).”

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 461 cases (44 in the last 5 years), 1933–2026 · leading case: United States v. Pan Pac. Textile Grp., Inc., 395 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Pan Pac. Textile Grp., Inc., 395 F. Supp. 2d 1244 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005). · cites it 59× “Customs moves for partial summary judgment against Tao, Pan Pacific, and Aviat Sportif (collectively, “defendants”) pursu *1246 ant to USCIT Rule 56, seeking the recovery of (1) unpaid duties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (d) based on alternative theories of fraud, gross negligence, or…”

United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc., 758 F.2d 741 (1st Cir. 1985). · cites it 23× “The United States alleged in substance that the appellant had imported the oil by means of false statements and false or fraudulent practices or appliances in violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1970). 4 Subse *746 quently, the government moved for partial summary judgment under Fed.”

United States v. Country Flavor Corp., 825 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012). · cites it 43× “§ 1505 (2006), 1 and unpaid antidumping duties and penalties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 , related to 13 entries of frozen fish fillets *1299 that Country Flavor imported from Vietnam in 2006.”

United States v. Ford Motor Co., 395 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005). · cites it 32× “OPINION TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge: Plaintiff, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”), seeks collection of a civil penalty pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988), and customs duties concerning entries of vehicles and vehicle…”

United States v. Ford Motor Co., 463 F.3d 1267 (Fed. Cir. 2006). · cites it 10× “The government filed its complaint in the Court of International Trade on January 29, 2002, charging Ford with violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 , which provides that “no person, by fraud, gross negligence, or negligence,” may enter any merchandise into the commerce of the United…”

United States v. ITT Indus., Inc., 343 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004). · cites it 25× “Rather, on October 30, 1991, Jabsco voluntarily disclosed to Customs that it had incorrectly identified the seventy bearing entries as “pump parts” or “needle roller bearings” on its Entry Summaries, a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a). 8 See Jt. Stat., Def.”

United States v. Inn Foods, Inc., 560 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009). · cites it 20× “Following a bench trial, the Court of International Trade held that Inn Foods was liable for monetary penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a) and for unpaid duties under § 1592(d).”

United States v. Deladiep, Inc., 2017 CIT 108 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017). · cites it 27× “60 as a civil penalty for negligent -violations of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a). See id. at 13 . As explained below, the well-pled facts in Plaintiffs complaint and supporting declarations accompanying Plaintiffs motion establish that Defendants are jointly and severally liable for…”

United States v. Maverick Mktg., LLC, 2018 CIT 84 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). · cites it 32× “of United States Customs and Border Protection ("Customs"), seeks to recover unpaid Federal Excise Tax ("FET"), in various amounts, and prejudgment interest from Maverick Marketing, LLC ("Maverick"), Good Times USA, LLC ("Good Times"), and American Alternative Insurance Company…”

United States v. Ford Motor Co., 387 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005). · cites it 31× “Plaintiff, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Department of Homeland Security (“Customs”), 1 seeks collection of a civil penalty and customs duties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (1988) concerning entries of automotive dies made by Ford Motor Company (“Ford”),…”

United States v. Maverick Mktg., LLC, 2018 CIT 16 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). · cites it 29× “Plaintiff, the United States ("Plaintiff"), on behalf of United States Customs and Border Protection ("CBP" or "Customs"), seeks to recover unpaid Federal Excise Tax ("FET"), in various amounts, and prejudgment interest from Defendants, Maverick, Good Times, and American…”

United States v. Matthews, 533 F. Supp. 2d 1307 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007). · cites it 17× “(“McGuire Steel”), with respect to their liability for penalties and lost duties for seven entries of silicon metal by McGuire Steel, and 89 entries of the same product by North Star, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a) and 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (d).”

Show all 461 citing cases →

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a) — 3 cases

United States v. Greenlight Organic, Inc., 2017 CIT 126 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).

United States v. Jac Natori Co., 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 930 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1995).

United States v. Jac Natori Co., 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 1219 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1995).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(1) — 3 cases

Kahrs Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 645 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009).

Tikal Distrib. Corp. v. United States, 970 F. Supp. 1056 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).

Kahrs Int'l, Inc. v. United States, 2009 CIT 101 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2009).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case

United States v. Six Star Wholesale, Inc., 2019 CIT 8 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2019).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)(v) — 1 case

Hayman v. Bldg Metro Capital LLC (D.D.C. 2023).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(b) — 1 case

United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co., 2018 CIT 29 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(b)(1)(A)(vii) — 1 case

United States v. KAB Trade Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 297 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(b)(2) — 1 case

United States v. Univar USA Inc., 355 F. Supp. 3d 1225 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c) — 1 case

United States v. KAB Trade Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 297 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c)(1) — 1 case

United States v. Greenlight Organic, Inc., 2017 CIT 126 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2017).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c)(3) — 1 case

United States v. ITT Indus., Inc., 343 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004). “Rather, on October 30, 1991, Jabsco voluntarily disclosed to Customs that it had incorrectly identified the seventy bearing entries as “pump parts” or “needle roller bearings” on its Entry Summaries, a violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a). 8 See Jt. Stat., Def.”

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c)(4) — 1 case

United States v. F.H. Fenderson, Inc., 11 Ct. Int'l Trade 657 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(c)(l) — 1 case

United States v. Inn Foods, Inc., 560 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2009). “Following a bench trial, the Court of International Trade held that Inn Foods was liable for monetary penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (a) and for unpaid duties under § 1592(d).”

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(d) — 1 case

United States v. Golden Ship Trading, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 950 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1998).

— 19 U.S.C. § 1592(e)(1) — 1 case

United States v. KAB Trade Co., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 297 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.