19 U.S.C. § 1600
Application of the customs laws to other seizures by customs officers
The procedures set forth in sections 1602 through 1619 of this title shall apply to seizures of any property effected by customs officers under any law enforced or administered by the Customs Service unless such law specifies different procedures.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2024 · leading case: Ali v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214 (2008).
Ali v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214 (2008). “, 19 U.S.C. § 1600 ("The procedures [governing seizures of property] set forth in [§§ 1602-1619] shall apply to seizures of any property effected by customs officers under any law enforced or administered by the Customs Service unless such law specifies different procedures").”
United States v. Giraldo, 45 F.3d 509 (1st Cir. 1995). “Section 881(d) states that the seizure of such property is to be accomplished through the application of the customs laws, 19 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq. These laws provide that property worth $500,000 or less is subject to administrative forfeiture without judicial involvement.”
United States v. Bouler, 927 F. Supp. 911 (W.D.N.C. 1996). “See 19 U.S.C. § 1600 . The procedures set out.”
United States v. Jay Michael Puig, Michael Hance, Claimant-Appellant, 419 F.3d 700 (8th Cir. 2005). “Section 881 further incorporates the forfeiture provisions related to violation of the customs laws, 19 U.S.C. §§ 1600 et seq., "insofar as applicable and not inconsistent with the provisions hereof.”
Nicolas v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 387 (Fed. Cl. 1996). “Relevant to the present problem is 19 U.S.C. § 1600 (1994). That section, captioned “Application of the customs laws to other seizures by customs officers,” reads as follows: The procedures set forth in sections 1602 through 1619 [relating, in the main, to the disposition of…”
B & F Trawlers, Inc. v. United States, 27 Fed. Cl. 299 (Fed. Cl. 1992). “6 19 U.S.C. § 1600 . *304 To the extent plaintiffs assert that the Coast Guard unlawfully sank and destroyed the STAR TREK, plaintiffs have failed to allege a tenable claim for a compensable taking; that is, plaintiffs allege a claim sounding in tort, which is beyond the…”
United States v. Abreu, 730 F. Supp. 1018 (D. Colo. 1990). “The vehicle was retained in DEA’s custody in New York City before it was ordered administratively forfeited pursuant to and in compliance with 19 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq., in December 1989.”
United States v. $94,000.00 in United States Currency, Along With Any Interest Earned Thereon in First Fin. Sav. Ass'n Account 79-70063411, 2 F.3d 778 (7th Cir. 1993). “In addition, 19 U.S.C. § 1600 , enacted in 1984, explicitly makes this provision applicable to the matter before us: The procedures set forth in sections 1602 through 1619 of this title shall apply to seizures of any property effected by customs officers under any law enforced…”
Emmens v. United States, 44 Fed. Cl. 524 (Fed. Cl. 1999). “In evaluating plaintiffs claim, the court turned to 19 U.S.C. § 1600 (“Application of the customs laws to other seizures by customs officers”), which states: “The procedures set forth in sections 1602 through 1619 of this title shall apply to seizures of any property effected by…”
Doe v. United States, 47 Fed. Cl. 367 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “§§ 841 (a)(1), 846, 952, and 963 not the Customs laws, and that therefore, by operation of 19 U.S.C. § 1600 (1994) (Section 1600), Section 1619 does not apply.”
Doe v. United States, 61 Fed. Cl. 453 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “” 19 U.S.C. § 1600 (emphasis added). The court has determined that the relevant drug statutes supplement and complement the moiety statute.”
Whiting v. United States, 29 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D. Mass. 1998). “Section 881(d) states that such a seizure is to be accomplished in accordance with the mandates of the customs laws, 19 U.S.C. § 1600 et seq. Customs laws provide for the forfeiture of property up to $500,000 without judicial involvement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.