U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 23— GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE RIGHTS

2 U.S.C. § 1219

Repealed. Pub. L. 104–331, § 5(a), Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4072

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2002 · leading case: Sean T. Haddon v. Exec. Residence at the White House, Exec. Residence at the White House v. Sean T. Haddon, 313 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sean T. Haddon v. Exec. Residence at the White House, Exec. Residence at the White House v. Sean T. Haddon, 313 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2002). · cites it 6× “II This case arises under 2 U.S.C. § 1219 , part of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.”
Sean T. Haddon v. Gary J. Walters, Chief Usher, 43 F.3d 1488 (D.C. Cir. 1995). · cites it 3× “2 U.S.C. § 1219 (Supp. Ill 1991) (“1991 Amendments” or “section 1219”).”
Haddon v. Walters, 836 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1993). · cites it 5× “Defendant Walters next argues that if any civil rights laws apply to employees of the Executive Residence, those provisions are found in Section 320 of the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991, 2 U.S.C. § 1219 . This section of the Code extends protection against employment…”
Stitz v. City of Eureka Springs, 9 F. Supp. 2d 1046 (W.D. Ark. 1998). “See 2 U.S.C.A. § 1219 (a)(3)(A) (1998). See also 17 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R.”
Haddon v. Freeh, 31 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 1998). “Walters in a hearing before an administrative law judge pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 1219 , a now-defunct statutory scheme.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.