20 U.S.C. § 1070h
Repealed. Pub. L. 117–103, div. R, § 103(c)(2), Mar. 15, 2022, 136 Stat. 821
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2024 · leading case: Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024).
Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024). “§ 9023 (d)(3); see 20 U. S. C. § 1070h(f). So again, Congress's non-time-limited grant to the CFPB for amounts (up to a cap) “reasonably necessary to carry out” its duties falls within an established tradition.”
Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024). “§9023 (d)(3); see 20 U. S. C. §1070h(f ). So again, Congress’s non-time-limited grant to the CFPB for amounts (up to a cap) “reasonably necessary to carry out” its duties falls within an established tradition.”
Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024). “§ 9023 (d)(3); see 20 U. S. C. § 1070h(f). So again, Congress's non-time-limited grant to the CFPB for amounts (up to a cap) “reasonably necessary to carry out” its duties falls within an established tradition.”
Application of the Hyde Amendment to Fed. Student-Aid Programs (OLC 2021). “See 20 U.S.C. § 1070h(f ); see also December 14 OMB E-mail (explaining that the Department could also draw upon the discretionary funding in its annual appropriations legislation to carry out the Service Grants program subject to certain potential restrictions).”
— 20 U.S.C. § 1070h(f) — 2 cases
Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024). “§ 9023 (d)(3); see 20 U. S. C. § 1070h(f). So again, Congress's non-time-limited grant to the CFPB for amounts (up to a cap) “reasonably necessary to carry out” its duties falls within an established tradition.”
Consum. Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Cmty. Fin. Servs. Assn. of Am., Ltd., 601 U.S. 416 (2024). “§ 9023 (d)(3); see 20 U. S. C. § 1070h(f). So again, Congress's non-time-limited grant to the CFPB for amounts (up to a cap) “reasonably necessary to carry out” its duties falls within an established tradition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.