U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 44— CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION

20 U.S.C. § 2307

Authorization of appropriations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar
There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter (other than sections 2324 and 2327 of this title)—(1) $1,229,568,538 for fiscal year 2019;(2) $1,246,782,498 for fiscal year 2020;(3) $1,264,237,452 for fiscal year 2021;(4) $1,281,936,777 for fiscal year 2022;(5) $1,299,883,892 for fiscal year 2023; and(6) $1,318,082,266 for fiscal year 2024.(Pub. L. 88–210, § 9, as added Pub. L. 109–270, § 1(b), Aug. 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 691; amended Pub. L. 115–224, § 10, July 31, 2018, 132 Stat. 1576.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 2307, Pub. L. 88–210, § 8, as added Pub. L. 105–332, § 1(b), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3083, related to authorization of appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 109–270.

Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–224 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this chapter (other than sections 2324, 2327, and 2328 of this title, and subchapter II) such sums as may be necessary for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 2012.”

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–224 effective July 1, 2019, see section 4 of Pub. L. 115–224, set out as a note under section 2301 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Sch. Comm. of the Town of Rockland v. Massachusetts Dep't of Educ., 753 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sch. Comm. of the Town of Rockland v. Massachusetts Dep't of Educ., 753 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Committee notes the “only requirements in 20 U.S.C. § 2307 which deal with violations of law are requirements prohibiting sex discrimination,” and, citing State Highway Commission of Missouri v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.