20 U.S.C. § 241c
Repealed. Pub. L. 95–561, title I, § 101(c), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2200
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1971–1982 · leading case: Shapp v. Sloan, 391 A.2d 595 (Pa. 1978).
Shapp v. Sloan, 391 A.2d 595 (Pa. 1978). “[2] Federal Augmentation Appropriation Act of 1976, Act of July 1, 1976, P.L. 1383, §§ 1 et seq. [3] By contrast, for example, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Act of April 11, 1965, P.”
Anna Barrera v. Hubert Wheeler, 475 F.2d 1338 (8th Cir. 1973). “See 20 U.S.C. § 241c (1972) ; H.R.Rep. No. 143, 89th Cong.”
Morgan v. Hennigan, 379 F. Supp. 410 (D. Mass. 1974). “§ 862 Children of Migratory Workers, 20 U.S.C. §§ 241c (a) (b), 241e(c) Guidance, Counseling and Testing, Title V-A, NDEA, 20 U.”
Doe v. Plyler, 458 F. Supp. 569 (E.D. Tex. 1978). “the ability of local education agencies to support adequate educational programs, the Congress hereby declares it to be the policy of the United States to provide financial assistance (as set forth in the following parts of this subchapter) to local educational agencies serving…”
Ambach v. Bell, 686 F.2d 974 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “See 20 U.S.C. § 241c (1976) (repealed 1978). The District Court quoted language from a National Institute of Education study that described practices under the old law.”
Brown v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 386 F. Supp. 110 (N.D. Ill. 1974). “20 U.S.C. § 241c; 45 C.F.R. §§ 116.2 and 116.”
Nicholson v. Pittenger, 364 F. Supp. 669 (E.D. Pa. 1973). “20 U.S.C. § 241c (b). 6 . The Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization also is a plaintiff.”
Barrera v. Wheeler, 441 F.2d 795 (8th Cir. 1971). “See 20 U.S.C. § 241c(a) (2). To receive benefits under Title I, the local educational agency must apply to its state educational agency, delineating the programs and projects in which it intends to use the funds.”
Nat'l Coalition for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Califano, 446 F. Supp. 193 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “& Admin.News 1446, 1450. To achieve this end, the United States Commissioner of Education is authorized to make grants to local educational agencies according to certain established formulae.”
Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Indep. Sch. Dist., 330 F. Supp. 1377 (S.D. Tex. 1971). “Although the law requires concentrations sufficient to make the grant worthwhile, the concentration is to be determined on an area basis 20 U.S.C. §§ 241c(b), 241d-ll(a) (2). It is further provided that additional grants are available for programs and projects “(A) which are…”
Nat'l Coalition for Pub. Ed., Etc. v. Califano, 446 F. Supp. 193 (S.D.N.Y. 1978). “S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1446, 1450. To achieve this end, the United States Commissioner of Education is authorized to make grants to local educational agencies according to certain established formulae.”
— 20 U.S.C. § 241c(a) — 1 case
Barrera v. Wheeler, 441 F.2d 795 (8th Cir. 1971). “See 20 U.S.C. § 241c(a) (2). To receive benefits under Title I, the local educational agency must apply to its state educational agency, delineating the programs and projects in which it intends to use the funds.”
— 20 U.S.C. § 241c(b) — 1 case
Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Indep. Sch. Dist., 330 F. Supp. 1377 (S.D. Tex. 1971). “Although the law requires concentrations sufficient to make the grant worthwhile, the concentration is to be determined on an area basis 20 U.S.C. §§ 241c(b), 241d-ll(a) (2). It is further provided that additional grants are available for programs and projects “(A) which are…”
— 20 U.S.C. § 241c(e) — 1 case
Anna Barrera v. Hubert Wheeler, 475 F.2d 1338 (8th Cir. 1973). “See 20 U.S.C. § 241c (1972) ; H.R.Rep. No. 143, 89th Cong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.