U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 51— ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION BLOCK GRANT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— CONSOLIDATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION › Part Part D— Secretary’s Discretionary Funds

20 U.S.C. § 3851

Repealed. Pub. L. 100–297, title I, § 1003(a), Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 293

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–1986 · leading case: United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 588 F. Supp. 132 (N.D. Ill. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 588 F. Supp. 132 (N.D. Ill. 1984). · cites it 17× “In each of fiscal years 1983 and 1984 Congress appropriated $28,765,000 for Secretary’s Discretionary Fund, 20 U.S.C. § 3851 . (Stip. 309; United States’ Response to Board’s First Request to Admit Nos.”
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 621 F. Supp. 1296 (N.D. Ill. 1985). · cites it 15× “( 20 U.S.C. § 3851 (a)(l)-(4)). 506. In fiscal year 1984, Congress on October 31, 1983 appropriated $28,765,000 for the Discretionary Fund, 20 U.”
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 567 F. Supp. 272 (N.D. Ill. 1983). · cites it 3× “Since fiscal year 1981 it has been the policy of the Department of Education to use funds in the Secretary’s Discretionary Fund only for the programs required by 20 U.S.C. § 3851 (b) or to support projects for research, demonstrations, training, dissemination or other activities…”
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chicago, 717 F.2d 378 (7th Cir. 1983). “, are reserved by the Secretary of Education to carry out the purposes specified in 20 U.S.C. § 3851 . 20 U.S.C. § 3813 (a). Out of the $28,765 million set aside for the Secretary’s discretionary fund for fiscal year 1983, approximately $10.”
United States v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 610 F. Supp. 702 (N.D. Ill. 1985). “About $10 million of this total is required to be spent to finance certain non-desegregation programs specified at 20 U.S.C. § 3851 (b). The remaining funds are under restraint and in dispute.”
United States v. Bd. of Educ., 642 F. Supp. 206 (N.D. Ill. 1986). · cites it 2× “The parties dispute whether the money will be spent on a “model” program, of “national significance,” as required by the relevant statute, 20 U.S.C. § 3851 . In particular, the United States complains that: (1) the project will not make “a contribution of national significance”;…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.