20 U.S.C. § 6302

Authorization of appropriations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Local educational agency grantsThere are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities described in part A—(1) $15,012,317,605 for fiscal year 2017;(2) $15,457,459,042 for fiscal year 2018;(3) $15,897,371,442 for fiscal year 2019; and(4) $16,182,344,591 for fiscal year 2020.(b) State assessments

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities described in part B, $378,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020.

(c) Education of migratory children

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities described in part C, $374,751,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020.

(d) Prevention and intervention programs for children and youth who are neglected, delinquent, or at-risk

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the activities described in part D, $47,614,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020.

(e) Federal activities

For the purpose of carrying out evaluation activities related to subchapter I under section 7981 of this title, there are authorized to be appropriated $710,000 for each of fiscal years 2017 through 2020.

(f) Sense of Congress regarding adjustments to authorizations of appropriations provided in this chapter for future budget agreements

It is the sense of Congress that if legislation is enacted that revises the limits on discretionary spending established under section 901(c) of title 2, the levels of appropriations authorized throughout this chapter should be adjusted in a manner that is consistent with the adjustments in nonsecurity category funding provided for under the revised limits on discretionary spending.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title I, § 1002, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title I, § 101, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1440; amended Pub. L. 114–95, title I, § 1002, Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 1814.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 6302, Pub. L. 89–10, title I, § 1002, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, § 101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3522; amended Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(4) [div. B, title XVI, § 1602], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–328, authorized appropriations, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

A prior section 1002 of Pub. L. 89–10 was renumbered section 9002 and was classified to section 3382 of this title, prior to the general amendment of Pub. L. 89–10 by Pub. L. 103–382.

Amendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–95 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (i) relating to authorization of appropriations for fiscal years 2002 through 2007.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2015 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–95 effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 114–95, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2003–2013 · leading case: Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008).
Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6302 (a), 6553, 6603(a), 6663, 6801(a), 7103.”
Alejo v. Torlakson, 212 Cal. App. 4th 768 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “(See 20 U.S.C. §§ 6302 , 6304.) The NCLB seeks to advance its purposes by, inter alia, meeting “the educational needs of low-achieving children in our Nation’s highest-poverty schools, limited English proficient children, migratory children, children with disabilities, Indian…”
Connecticut v. Duncan, 612 F.3d 107 (2d Cir. 2010). “20 U.S.C. § 6302 . Congress passed the Act pursuant to its power under the Spending Clause of the Constitution, Article I, Section 8.”
Newark Parents Ass'n v. Newark Pub. Schs., 547 F.3d 199 (3rd Cir. 2008). “20 U.S.C. § 6302 (a). And as in Sabree, where the Medicaid Act’s enforcement provision “empower[ed] the Secretary of HHS to suspend payments to a state if it fails to ‘comply substantially’ with the requirements of Title XIX,” the NCLBA’s enforcement provision “creates a…”
Ass'n of Cmty. Organizations for Reform Now v. New York City Dep't of Educ., 269 F. Supp. 2d 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). “See 20 U.S.C. §§ 6302®, 6303(g), 6311(a)(1), 6316(a)(1).”
Chester Upland Sch. Dist. v. Commonwealth, 861 F. Supp. 2d 492 (E.D. Pa. 2012). “Dep’t of Edue., Elementary & Secondary Education: Improving Basic Programs Operated by Local Educational Agencies (Title I, Part A), Program Description, http://www2.”
Fresh Start Academy v. Toledo Bd. of Educ., 363 F. Supp. 2d 910 (N.D. Ohio 2005). “20 U.S.C. §§ 6302 , 6332. The Act instructs LEAs like the Board to make a specified amount of the LEA’s federal allocation available for SES, 20 U.”
Pontiac Sch. Dist v. Sec US Dept Ed (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6302 (a), 6553, 6603(a), 6663, 6801(a), 7103.”
Newark Parents Assn v. Newark Pub Sch (3rd Cir. 2008). “20 U.S.C. § 6302 (a). And as in Sabree, where the Medicaid Act’s enforcement provision “empower[ed] the Secretary of HHS to suspend payments to a state if it fails to ‘comply substantially’ with the requirements of Title XIX,” the NCLBA’s enforcement provision “creates a…”
Applicability of Section 504 of the Rehab. Act to Tribally Controlled Schs. (OLC 2004). “2003) (local educational agencies eligible for assistance for educating children with disabilities); 20 U.S.C.A. § 6302 (West 2003) (authorization of grants to local educational agencies).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.