U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 3— SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, NATIONAL MUSEUMS AND ART GALLERIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER V— JOHN F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS

20 U.S.C. § 76m

Photovoltaic system

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In general

The Board may study, plan, design, engineer, and construct a photovoltaic system for the main roof of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

(b) Report

Not later than 60 days before beginning construction of the photovoltaic system pursuant to subsection (a), the Board shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report on the feasibility and design of the project.

(Pub. L. 85–874, § 7, as added, Pub. L. 110–338, § 3, Oct. 3, 2008, 122 Stat. 3731.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 76m, Pub. L. 85–874, § 7, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1700; Pub. L. 86–297, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 573; Pub. L. 88–100, § 4, Aug. 19, 1963, 77 Stat. 128; Pub. L. 88–260, § 1(2), Jan. 23, 1964, 78 Stat. 4; Pub. L. 99–514, § 2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, which related to termination of offices created and appointments made in connection with John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts if moneys were not found to construct the Center within eight years after Sept. 2, 1958, was repealed by Pub. L. 101–449, § 3, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1050.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2026–2026 · leading case: Dc Pres. League v. Bd. of Trs. of the John F. Kennedy Ctr. for the Performing Arts (D.D.C. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dc Pres. League v. Bd. of Trs. of the John F. Kennedy Ctr. for the Performing Arts (D.D.C. 2026). “As for the seemingly less intrusive addition of a “photovoltaic system” on the roof of the main building, see 20 U.S.C. § 76m, the Kennedy Center had to go to Congress anyway to secure a specific appropriation for the work, see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.