21 U.S.C. § 175

Repealed. June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, § 403(a)(10), 66 Stat. 279

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 21 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1929–1957 · leading case: Dang Nam v. Bryan, 74 F.2d 379 (9th Cir. 1934).
Dang Nam v. Bryan, 74 F.2d 379 (9th Cir. 1934). · cites it 6× “The warrant of deportation was issued notwithstanding the recommendation of the trial judge and notwithstanding the circumstances under which the plea of guilty was entered upon the theory that the statute of 1931 required such deportation and that the provisions of 8 USCA §…”
Ex Parte Eng, 77 F. Supp. 74 (N.D. Cal. 1948). · cites it 4× “as Section 175: 21 U.S.C.A. § 175 : “Any alien who at any time after his entry is convicted under section 174 of this title shall upon the termination of the imprisonment imposed by the court upon such conviction and upon, warrant issued by the Secretary of Labor be taken into…”
Gerys Dessalernos v. Joseph Savoretti, Dist. Dir., United States Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., Miami, Florida, 244 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1957). “…of Title 8) § 155(d) (1) referring to § 137: anarchists, subversives, etc. § 1251(a) (7)* § 155(d) (2) referring to 21 U.S.C.A. § 175 : importing narcotics § 1251(a) (11)* § 155(d) (3) referring to § 156a: trading in narcotics § 1251(a) (11)* § 155(d) (4) referring to §…”
Hachiji Shibata v. Tillinghast, 31 F.2d 801 (D. Mass. 1929). “614 ), as amended by Act May 26, 1922, § 1 (21 USCA § 175), which provides that: “(e) Any alien who at any time after his entry is convicted under subdivision (c) shall, upon the termination of the imprisonment imposed by the court upon such conviction and upon warrant issued by…”
United States ex rel. Cassetta v. Comm'r of Immigr., 56 F.2d 826 (2d Cir. 1932). “Deportation of the alien was initiated upon the ground that he had been convicted of a violation of section 2 (c) of the Act of May 26, 1922, relating to narcotic drugs (21 USCA § 174), and was therefore deportable in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (e) of said…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.