21 U.S.C. § 887
Coordination and consolidation of post-seizure administration
The Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury shall take such action as may be necessary to develop and maintain a joint plan to coordinate and consolidate post-seizure administration of property seized under this subchapter, subchapter II, or provisions of the customs laws relating to controlled substances.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1994–2017 · leading case: Howard v. Zimmer, Inc., 299 P.3d 463 (Okla. 2013).
Howard v. Zimmer, Inc., 299 P.3d 463 (Okla. 2013). “1 24 The language of 21 U.S.C. § 887 provides that all actions to enforce violations of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States.”
United States v. Real Prop. Identified As: Parcel XXXXX-XXXR, 287 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 2003). “21 U.S.C. § 887 (a)(1) " ‘requirfed] the forfeiture of any real property and improvements thereon when there is probable cause to believe that the property was used to facilitate a violation of [the drug trafficking statute] One Single Family Residence, 894 F.”
United States v. One Parcel Prop. Located at 427 & 429 Hall Street, 853 F. Supp. 1389 (M.D. Ala. 1994). “On September 23, 1991, the Government filed its complaint for forfeiture of the defendant property pursuant to § 881(a)(7) on the ground that it was used to facilitate the distribution of narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 887 (a)(7) & 846. Since Wall was acquitted of…”
Com. v. R. Teeter (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2017). “The Majority recognizes that the language of our Forfeiture Act mirrors the language of the Federal forfeiture statutes, namely 21 U.S.C. §887 (a)(7), which subjects to forfeiture All real property, including any right, title, and interest (including any leasehold interest) in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.