22 U.S.C. § 1002

Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, § 2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 22 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1975–2002 · leading case: Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93 (1979).
Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93 (1979). · cites it 6× “1015 , as amended, 22 U. S. C. § 1002 , mandates the retirement at age 60 of participants in the Foreign Service retirement system.”
Bradley v. Kissinger, 418 F. Supp. 64 (D.D.C. 1976). · cites it 3× “This action is brought by ten Foreign Service employees of the Department of State or the United States Information Agency who have been or will be subject to mandatory retirement at age 60, pursuant to Section 632 of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 1002…”
Sasso v. Ram Prop. Mgmt., 431 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). “1015 , as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 1002 ) was "to create predictable promotion opportunities and thus spur morale and stimulate superior performance in the ranks.”
Delaware River Basin Comm'n v. Bucks Cnty. Water & Sewer Auth., 641 F.2d 1087 (3rd Cir. 1981). “The Court found this provision supported by a rational basis, even though no mandatory retirement age is established for Civil Service employees, including those who serve abroad.”
Bradley v. Vance, 436 F. Supp. 134 (D.D.C. 1977). · cites it 2× “Section 632 of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 1002 , mandates retirement at age sixty for certain employees of the State Department, the United States Information Agency (“USIA”), and the Agency for International Development (“AID”).”
Britell v. United States, 204 F. Supp. 2d 182 (D. Mass. 2002). “In Vance , a group of foreign service officers challenged the constitutionality of Section 632 of the Foreign Service Act of 1946, 22 U.S.C. § 1002 , which required all persons covered by the Foreign Service retirement system to retire at age 60.”
Colm v. Kissinger, 406 F. Supp. 1250 (D.D.C. 1975). “22 U.S.C. § 1002 (1970). 17 . 22 U.S.C. § 1007 (a) (1970).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.