22 U.S.C. § 83 to 104
Transferred
22 U.S.C. § 101 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 22 U.S.C. § 83 to 104, shown below.
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–2004 · leading case: In re Soltan, 234 B.R. 260 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1999).
In re Soltan, 234 B.R. 260 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1999). “The Bankruptcy Court found that the city had a statutory lien on the affected real estate, pursuant to New York City Charter § 1519(2) and 22 U.S.C. § 101 (53) (1993), and that the perfection of the lien, during the post-petition period, was not in violation of the Automatic…”
Harpal Singh Cheema Rajwinder Kaur v. John Ashcroft, 372 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2004). “22 U.S.C. § 101 (b)(2) (1986); Sampson at 177.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.