22 U.S.C. § 6084
Limitation of actions
An action under section 6082 of this title may not be brought more than 2 years after the trafficking giving rise to the action has ceased to occur.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Pujol Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A.
Pujol Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A. (2021)
“” 22 U.S.C. § 6084 . For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs do have constitutional standing but that their claims are indeed time barred.”
Moreira v. Société Générale (2025)
“The principal issue on this consolidated appeal is whether 22 U.S.C. § 6084 , the time bar provision of the Helms-Burton Act, Pub.”
Havana Docks Corporation v. Carnival Corporation (2020)
“Defendant now moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint on two primary grounds: (1) Plaintiff lacks Article III standing to sue because it cannot allege an invasion of a legally protected interest or any injury fairly traceable to Defendant; and (2) Plaintiff’s allegations of…”
Sucesores de Don Carlos Nunez y Dona Pura Galvez, Inc. v. Societe Generale, S.A. (2023)
“” 22 U.S.C. § 6084 . Despite this limitation, Plaintiffs argue that the pre- 2010 claims are timely due to equitable tolling and, in the alternative, because the dealings that BNC had with Defendants, including those which occurred during the repose period, “give rise to a…”
Pujol Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A. (2023)
“” 22 U.S.C. § 6084 ; see Moreira v. Société Générale, S.”
Pujol Moreira v. Societe Generale, S.A. (2023)
“” 22 U.S.C. § 6084 . Accordingly, Paribas’s motion to dismiss must be and is GRANTED, and the Court need not and does not address Paribas’s other arguments for dismissal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.