23 U.S.C. § 511

Multistate corridor operations and management

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 23 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—The Secretary shall encourage multistate cooperative agreements, coalitions, or other arrangements to promote regional cooperation, planning, and shared project implementation for programs and projects to improve transportation system management and operations.(b)Interstate Route 95 Corridor Coalition Transportation Systems Management and Operations.—The Secretary shall make grants under this subsection to States to continue intelligent transportation system management and operations in the Interstate Route 95 corridor coalition region initiated under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102–240).(Added Pub. L. 109–59, title V, § 5211(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1804.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 102–240, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1914. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1991 Amendment note set out under section 101 of Title 49, Transportation, and Tables.

Prior Provisions

A prior section 511, formerly 510, added Pub. L. 90–495, § 30, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 834; renumbered § 511, Pub. L. 91–605, title I, § 117(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1724, related to authority of Secretary, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 91–646, title II, § 220(a)(10), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1903.

Another prior section 511 was renumbered section 512 of this title and subsequently repealed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1971–1972 · leading case: Roosevelt Lathan & Pearline Lathan, His Wife v. John A. Volpe, as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Transp., 455 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir. 1972).
Roosevelt Lathan & Pearline Lathan, His Wife v. John A. Volpe, as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Transp., 455 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir. 1972). “* * *” 23 U.S.C. § 511 (3). (Emphasis added.) The approval of the corridor in 1963 was, as the federal defendants say in their brief, “under § 106.”
United States v. Braddy, 320 F. Supp. 1239 (D. Or. 1971). “The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968, 23 U.S.C. § 511 (3), defines a “displaced person” entitled to relocation payments as one who moves from real property as a result of its acquisition or with a “reasonable expectation” of its acquisition by the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.