25 U.S.C. § 112
Persons present at delivery of goods and money
The superintendent, agent, or subagent, together with such military officer as the President may direct, shall be present, and certify to the delivery of all goods and money required to be paid or delivered to the Indians.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: Stuart v. Rust-Oleum Corp.
Stuart v. Rust-Oleum Corp. (2017)
“Plaintiffs, by contrast, argue that Defendants’ motion to dismiss for indefiniteness is premature because assessing indefiniteness under 25 U.S.C. § 112 ¶2 requires claim construction, which has not yet occurred in this case.”
Genentech, Inc. v. Boehringer Mannheim GmbH (1997)
“at 1564, and meets the requirements of 25 U.S.C. § 112 , is not appropriate for a Markman hearing.”
Sigram Schindler Beteiligungsgesellschaft v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (2010)
“The court need not stay consideration of the obviousness of the '431 patent; insofar as the court finds the '431 invalid under 25 U.S.C. § 112 , as discussed infra, that issue is moot.”
USA Video Technology Corp. v. MOVIELINK LLC (2005)
“134), and a Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 25 U.S.C. § 112 and to Strike Portions of Expert Report (D.”
American Original Corp. v. Jenkins Food Corp. (1982)
“The finding of the district *1061 court that there was no fraud is supported by the record and it is not clearly erroneous.”
RAZOR USA LLC v. DGL GROUP, LTD. (2022)
“) The Examiner again rejected the drawings under 25 U.S.C. § 112 (a) for failing to comply with the statutory written description requirement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.