25 U.S.C. § 1300f

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1988 · leading case: Val/Del, Inc. v. Superior Court, 703 P.2d 502 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985).
Val/Del, Inc. v. Superior Court, 703 P.2d 502 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 7× “Petitioner contends that regardless of the recognition by the federal government of the Pascua Yaqui Indian people in 25 U.S.C. § 1300f, that recognition was conditioned upon the tribe’s waiver of sovereign immunity because of the provisions of 25 U.”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Indus. Comm'n, 696 P.2d 223 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “It appears this waiver was based in part on 25 U.S.C. § 1300f(c), granting the State of Arizona the right to exercise civil jurisdiction within the boundaries of the Pascua Yaqui Tribal lands.”
State v. Flint, 756 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 1300f(c). However, it is not clear whether such delegation is still effective in the face of the Arizona Governor's attempted retrocession of jurisdiction and Ariz.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1300f(a) — 1 case
Val/Del, Inc. v. Superior Court, 703 P.2d 502 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “Petitioner contends that regardless of the recognition by the federal government of the Pascua Yaqui Indian people in 25 U.S.C. § 1300f, that recognition was conditioned upon the tribe’s waiver of sovereign immunity because of the provisions of 25 U.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1300f(c) — 3 cases
Val/Del, Inc. v. Superior Court, 703 P.2d 502 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “Petitioner contends that regardless of the recognition by the federal government of the Pascua Yaqui Indian people in 25 U.S.C. § 1300f, that recognition was conditioned upon the tribe’s waiver of sovereign immunity because of the provisions of 25 U.”
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Indus. Comm'n, 696 P.2d 223 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “It appears this waiver was based in part on 25 U.S.C. § 1300f(c), granting the State of Arizona the right to exercise civil jurisdiction within the boundaries of the Pascua Yaqui Tribal lands.”
State v. Flint, 756 P.2d 324 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 1300f(c). However, it is not clear whether such delegation is still effective in the face of the Arizona Governor's attempted retrocession of jurisdiction and Ariz.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.