U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 19— INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENTS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VIII— SENECA NATION (NEW YORK) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

25 U.S.C. § 1774c

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2001 · leading case: Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease Auth., 847 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D.N.Y. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease Auth., 847 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D.N.Y. 1994). · cites it 4× “25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). H« * * ❖ * * [N]othing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the lessees from collectively negotiating with the Seneca Nation regarding such leases, whether through informal groups or as delegations formally sanctioned by either the State or…”
Banner v. United States, 238 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “” 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). . This court holds only that the ownership interest of improvements under the 99-year leases reverted to the SNI at the expiration of those leases.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a) — 2 cases
Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease Auth., 847 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D.N.Y. 1994). “25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). H« * * ❖ * * [N]othing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the lessees from collectively negotiating with the Seneca Nation regarding such leases, whether through informal groups or as delegations formally sanctioned by either the State or…”
Banner v. United States, 238 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). . This court holds only that the ownership interest of improvements under the 99-year leases reverted to the SNI at the expiration of those leases.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(b)(2) — 1 case
Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease Auth., 847 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D.N.Y. 1994). “25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). H« * * ❖ * * [N]othing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the lessees from collectively negotiating with the Seneca Nation regarding such leases, whether through informal groups or as delegations formally sanctioned by either the State or…”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(c)(l) — 1 case
Banner v. United States, 238 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “” 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). . This court holds only that the ownership interest of improvements under the 99-year leases reverted to the SNI at the expiration of those leases.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 1774c(d)(l) — 1 case
Fluent v. Salamanca Indian Lease Auth., 847 F. Supp. 1046 (W.D.N.Y. 1994). “25 U.S.C. § 1774c(a). H« * * ❖ * * [N]othing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the lessees from collectively negotiating with the Seneca Nation regarding such leases, whether through informal groups or as delegations formally sanctioned by either the State or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.