U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 19— INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENTS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER XI— SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

25 U.S.C. § 1777d

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: State v. Quintana, 178 P.3d 823 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Quintana, 178 P.3d 823 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 1777c(c)(3), (5); 25 U.S.C. § 1777d(b). There is no evidence that Santo Domingo purchased this strip of land before the Act was in effect and owned it at the time of the accident.”
25 U.S.C. § 1777d(b): 1 case
State v. Quintana, 178 P.3d 823 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 1777c(c)(3), (5); 25 U.S.C. § 1777d(b). There is no evidence that Santo Domingo purchased this strip of land before the Act was in effect and owned it at the time of the accident.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.