25 U.S.C. § 500
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1982–2003 · leading case: Harry H. Karmun & Alice G. Karmun v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 749 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1984).
Harry H. Karmun & Alice G. Karmun v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 749 F.2d 567 (9th Cir. 1984). “The partnership operates a herd of approximately 2,000 reindeer under the provisions of the Reindeer Industry Act of 1937, 25 U.S.C. § 500 (1982) (the Reindeer Act or the Act).”
Williams v. Babbitt, 115 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 1997). “We must decide whether the Reindeer Industry Act of 1937, 25 U.S.C. §§ 500 et seq., prohibits reindeer herding by non-natives in Alaska.”
Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Norton, 353 F.3d 712 (9th Cir. 2003). “1997), we declined to adopt the Department of the Interior’s interpretation of the Reindeer Industry Act of 1937, 25 U.S.C. §§ 500 -500n. Although the agency’s interpretation was “not unreasonable” and was owed Chevron deference, we ruled that the agency’s interpretation raised…”
Alaska Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of Am., Inc. v. Pierce, 694 F.2d 1162 (9th Cir. 1982). “The Reindeer Industry Act of 1937, 25 U.S.C. § 500 , which provided federal funds and property to the natives of Alaska for subsistence and a self-sustaining economy, defined “Natives of Alaská” as: native Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts of whole or part blood inhabiting Alaska at…”
Taxability of Indian Treaty Fishing Income (OLC 1985). “1984), the Ninth Circuit applied this analysis in a case arising under the Reindeer Industry Act of 1937, 25 U.S.C. § 500 . That Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to acquire for the Alaskan natives reindeer and other property owned by non-natives.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.