U.S. Code » Title 25 » Chapter CHAPTER 46— INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION ASSISTANCE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— CONTRACTS WITH STATES

25 U.S.C. § 5342

Contracts for education, medical attention, relief and social welfare of Indians

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to enter into a contract or contracts with any State or Territory, or political subdivision thereof, or with any State university, college, or school, or with any appropriate State or private corporation, agency, or institution, for the education, medical attention, agricultural assistance, and social welfare, including relief of distress, of Indians in such State or Territory, through the agencies of the State or Territory or of the corporations and organizations hereinbefore named, and to expend under such contract or contracts, moneys appropriated by Congress for the education, medical attention, agricultural assistance, and social welfare, including relief of distress, of Indians in such State or Territory.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Nally v. Graham (D. Kan. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nally v. Graham (D. Kan. 2021). “and responsibility to the Indian people for the education of Indian children and for the operation and financial support of the Bureau of Indian Affairs-funded school system.”
Chicharello v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior (D.N.M. 2021). “25 U.S.C. § 5342 . The Act also authorizes IECs, sometimes called Indian Parent Committees or IPCs, to partner with schools and school districts that receive JOM funding in order to develop and implement these supplemental educational programs.”
Chicharello v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior (D.N.M. 2021). “25 U.S.C. § 5342 . The Act also authorizes IECs, sometimes called Indian Parent Committees or IPCs, to partner with schools and school districts that receive JOM funding in order to develop and implement these supplemental educational programs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.