25 U.S.C. § 609
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Pueblo of Zuni v. United States
Pueblo of Zuni v. United States (2006)
“Defendant in Cherokee Nation argued that the case really concerned a proper interpretation of the ISDA rather than a money dispute, in order to avoid the de novo standard of review that is called for under the CDA under 25 U.S.C. § 609 (a)(3). See, 190 F.Supp.2d at 1255 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.