25 U.S.C. § 638

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S. 287 (2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Navajo Nation, 556 U.S. 287 (2009). · cites it 2× “25 U. S. C. §638 Next, the Tribe points to a second provision in the Navajo-Hopi Rehabilitation Act: “The Tribal Councils of the Navajo and Hopi Tribes and the Indian communities affected shall be kept informed and afforded opportunity to consider from their inception plans…”

Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakama Nation v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 589 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “Stanley Chan, an Accounting Technician for the Billing and Collection Office of the NBC, has submitted a declaration stating that the NBC has prepared Ridgerunners’ file for transfer to Treasury, but is unable to make the transfer because the Yakama Nation’s employees, acting…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.