25 U.S.C. § 677t
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1994–1996 · leading case: Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994).
Hackford v. Babbitt, 14 F.3d 1457 (10th Cir. 1994). “” 25 U.S.C. § 677t. For the purpose of the division, water rights were treated as appurtenant to the lands that were divided between the groups.”
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah, 935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah 1996). “Individual Mixed-Blood Utes became subject to state laws “in the same manner as they apply to other citizens within their jurisdiction,” i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.