25 U.S.C. § 980
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1971–1994 · leading case: St. Cloud v. Leapley, 521 N.W.2d 118 (S.D. 1994).
St. Cloud v. Leapley, 521 N.W.2d 118 (S.D. 1994). “] 25 U.S.C. § 980 . Approximately twenty-four years after the effective date of termination (1966), Congress restored federal recognition to the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska in 1990.”
St. Cloud v. United States, 702 F. Supp. 1456 (D.S.D. 1988). “25 U.S.C. § 980 . The Secretary of the Interior proclaimed the distribution of assets complete on October 26, 1966.”
In Re Interest of JLM, 451 N.W.2d 377 (Neb. 1990). “25 U.S.C. § 980 . At the March 13 hearing, the State presented documentary evidencea letter from the Yankton Sioux Tribe and a letter from the Tribal Government Services of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior.”
United States v. Theodore Floyd Burland, 441 F.2d 1199 (9th Cir. 1971). “795 ) ; and Ponca Tribe of Nebraska, 25 U.S.C. § 980 . 7 . United States v. Kagama, supra, 118 U.”
State v. K.M., 451 N.W.2d 377 (Neb. 1990). “25 U.S.C. § 980 . At the March 13 hearing, the State presented documentary evidence — a letter from the Yankton Sioux Tribe and a letter from the Tribal Government Services of the Bureau of Indian *393 Affairs, Department of the Interior.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.