25 U.S.C. § 983b

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 25 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2019 · leading case: Nebraska Ex Rel. Bruning v. United States Dep't of Interior, 625 F.3d 501 (8th Cir. 2010).
Nebraska Ex Rel. Bruning v. United States Dep't of Interior, 625 F.3d 501 (8th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “25 U.S.C. § 983b(c). While the Secretary may, pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.”
St. Cloud v. Leapley, 521 N.W.2d 118 (S.D. 1994). · cites it 2× “" 25 U.S.C. § 983b. In 1983, during the interim period when the Ponca tribe was terminated, St.”
City of Council Bluffs v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 368 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (S.D. Iowa 2019). · cites it 2× “25 U.S.C. § 983b. Looking solely at the statutory language, this provision requires the Secretary to accept the transfer of land in Knox or Boyd Counties, Nebraska, for the benefit of the Tribe.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 983b(c) — 1 case
Nebraska Ex Rel. Bruning v. United States Dep't of Interior, 625 F.3d 501 (8th Cir. 2010). “25 U.S.C. § 983b(c). While the Secretary may, pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.”
— 25 U.S.C. § 983b(e) — 1 case
City of Council Bluffs v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 368 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (S.D. Iowa 2019). “25 U.S.C. § 983b. Looking solely at the statutory language, this provision requires the Secretary to accept the transfer of land in Knox or Boyd Counties, Nebraska, for the benefit of the Tribe.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.